×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
No Court Access Right to Litigate Civil Forfeiture
Loaded on Sept. 15, 1999
published in Prison Legal News
September, 1999, page 21
The U.S. court of appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that prisoners do not have an access-to-court right to defend against civil forfeiture. The court also accorded qualified immunity, sua sponte, to all defendants on the prisoner's conditions of confinement claims.On September 12, 1991, Donald Wilson was arrested on …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Wreaking Medical Mayhem in Washington Prisons, by Tara Herivel
- A Foul Trend Emerges, by Tara Herivel
- Is Health Care Too Much to Ask For?, by Silja JA Talvi
- Ex-Prisoner Gets $850,000 for Broken Neck
- Arkansas Department of Corruption Revealed
- County Jail Political Shenanigans, Corruption Revealed
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- Crime and Punishment in America, by Elliot Currie (Review), by H Bruce Franklin
- The Way the Wind Blew: A History of the Weather Underground, by Ron Jacobs (Review), by Paul Wright
- Texas Prison Warehouses (Letter), by DG "Tex" Hoffman
- Beaten Connecticut Jail Detainee Awarded $2.07 Million
- Missouri Proposes $2.2 Million Settlement
- New Mexico Riot Rooted in Religious Rights
- Rikers Island Detainee Shot
- Tennessee Supreme Court Upholds Private Prison Disciplinary Procedures
- Prison Realty Board Member Settles Ethics Complaints
- West Virginia DOC Commissioner Resigns After Beating Wife
- Pro Se Pennsylvania Prisoner Awarded $100,000 in Guard Attack
- Texas Jail Whistleblower Awarded $3.3 Million
- Washington 35% Spousal Suit Update
- Arizona DOC Settles Kosher Diet Suit
- US Supreme Court Holds Media Ride-Alongs Unconstitutional
- Transsexual Awarded $755,000 in Jail Strip Search
- PLRA Physical Injury Requirement Constitutional, by James Quigley
- Tobacco Smoke Exposure Requires Trial
- DC Circuit Lifts Injunction on BOP Porn Ban
- De Novo Review for § 1915A Dismissals
- Third Circuit Holds 28 USC § 1915(g) Does Not Apply Retroactively
- Three Strikes Upheld by Ninth Circuit
- Administrative Exhaustion Required in all Cases
- State Court Dismissals Don't Count as Strikes
- Automatic Stay Provision Unconstitutional
- Total Administrative Exhaustion Not Required
- No Exhaustion Required in Wisconsin When Only Money Damages Are Sought
- No Written Screening or Administrative Exhaustion Required
- Physical Injury Requirement Doesn't Apply to Court Access Claims
- Fact Issue of Physical Injury Precludes Summary Judgment, by Ronald Young
- Wright Dismissed on Remand
- Private Prison Denied Wiretap Exception
- No Court Access Right to Litigate Civil Forfeiture
- Prisoners Have First Amendment Right to Private Conversations with Their Attorneys
- Liberty Interest in Erroneous Parole Release, by Ronald Young
- Prisoner Suing Prison Physician for Deliberate Indifference
- Prisoner Can Attend His Civil Trial at Government Expense
- Stun Belts in Court Unconstitutional
- Federal Parolee Has Right to Hearing Under 18 USC § 4211(a)(2)
- Lack of Standing Eviscerates Court Access Class Action
- News in Brief
- PLRA Dismissals for Failure to Plead Physical Injury Reviewed De Novo
- Denial of Exercise Is "Atypical and Significant"
More from these topics:
- $1 Million Settlement Reached in Jail Suicide of Maryland Detainee Whose Emergency Hospitalization Order Was Ignored, June 1, 2026. Qualified Immunity, Failure to Protect (Wrongful Death), Suicides, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Deliberate Indifference.
- Sixth Circuit Rules Prisoner Held After Parole Board Ordered Release on Parole Could Not State a Rights Violation Claim, June 1, 2026. Parole, Overdetention, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights.
- ACLU Threatens New Lawsuit After Indiana County’s Repeated Failures to Abide by 17-Year-Old Settlement Agreement, May 1, 2026. Overcrowding, Exercise, Sanitation, Bedding, Settlements.
- Fourth Circuit Revives North Carolina Prisoner’s Suit Blaming Lazy Guards for Assault by Detainee, May 1, 2026. Failure to Protect (General), Qualified Immunity, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Deliberate Indifference.
- $2.75 Million Paid by Washington County and NaphCare for Jail Detainee’s Suicide, April 1, 2026. Naphcare, Qualified Immunity, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Suicides, Deliberate Indifference.
- $10.3 Million Paid for Teen’s Death at Kansas Juvenile Detention Facility, April 1, 2026. Restraints, Qualified Immunity, Excessive Force (Wrongful Death), 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Eighth Circuit Revives Case Against Guards Who Failed to Intervene As Chaplain Sexually Assaulted Arkansas Prisoner, March 1, 2026. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Failure to Protect (General), Prison Rape Elimination Act, Qualified Immunity, Failure to Train/Supervise.
- Sixth Circuit Revives Michigan Prisoner’s Challenge to Guard Tackle That Broke His Foot, March 1, 2026. Evidentiary Ruling (Disciplinary Hearings), Guard Brutality/Beatings, Summary Judgment, Qualified Immunity, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Louisiana Prisoner Sustains Claim Against Prison Doctor for Allowing Assignment to “Field Duty” Despite Known Ankle Injury, March 1, 2026. Inability to Work, Skeletal Injury, Summary Judgment, Qualified Immunity, Deliberate Indifference.
- Tenth Circuit Affirmed Denial of Guards Qualified Immunity in Disabled Detainee’s Fourteenth Amendment Claim, March 1, 2026. Failure to Treat, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Deliberate Indifference.

