×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
California's Parole Revocation System Violates Due Process
Loaded on Jan. 15, 2003
by John E Dannenberg
published in Prison Legal News
January, 2003, page 16
by John E. Dannenberg
Filed under:
Attorney Fee Awards,
Appointment of Counsel,
Attorney Client,
PLRA,
Injunctions (PLRA),
Parole.
Location:
California.
In a class action civil rights case, the United States District Court (E.D. Calif.) held that California's parole revocation system violates procedural due process of law because it does not provide for a preliminary hearing to determine if probable cause for a parole hold exists.
Parolees ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Washington Prison Health Care Substandard, by Angela Galloway
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Habeas Hints: Procedural Update, by Kent Russell
- The Long Silence: Federal Prisoners' Fight to Get the Word Out Reaches Unprintable Extremes, by Alan Prendergast
- Book Review: From Prison to Home, by Roger Hummel
- North Carolina Jail Fire Kills Eight Prisoners
- Alabama DOC Quickly Settles Prison Working Conditions Suit, by John E Dannenberg
- Hustler Magazine Survives Arizona Prison Obscenity Test
- Los Angeles County Settles Overdetention Suits for $27 Million, by John E Dannenberg
- Sexual Assault Violates Eighth Amendment
- Wackenhut Warden and Six Guards Convicted In New Mexico Prisoner Beatings
- California's Parole Revocation System Violates Due Process, by John E Dannenberg
- Virginia Guards Acquitted of Assaulting Prisoner, by Michael Rigby
- Sentence Commuted for Sexually Assaulted New Mexico Prisoner
- Ninth Circuit Upholds BOP's Prorated Good Time Formula
- Inartful Pro Se Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Survives Motion to Dismiss
- Deaf Michigan Prisoner's ADA/RA Suit Survives Dismissal Challenge
- USPC Parole Revocation Policies Violate Due Process, by David Reutter
- Trial in Prison Violates Oregon's "Public Trial" Guarantee
- Amendment of Complaint to Identify Unknown Defendant Denied
- Denial of Wheelchair Claims Survive Summary Judgment
- PLRA Does Not Apply to Juvenile Facilities; $379,000 Attorney Fees and Costs Awarded, by David Reutter
- Excessive Force and Delaying Medical Treatment Defeats Dismissal
- Diabetic's Amputation Suit Set for Trial
- No Immunity for Failing to Protect Murdered Informant; Correctional Industries Employees Are State Actors
- Colorado Ad-Seg Decisions Subject to Judicial Review
- 7th Circuit: PLRA Exhaustion Requirements Retroactive; BOP Has Late Grievance Hardship Exception
- $27,848.30 Award in Texas Jail Slip and Fall Upheld
- A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual, Fifth Ed. and 2002 Supplement, by Paul Wright
- Less Restrictive Alternatives Must Be Considered in Washington Sex Predator Commitments
- Brutal Jail Conditions Warrant Reduced Federal Prison Sentence
- News in Brief
- FLSA Inapplicable to Oklahoma Prisoners in Private Prisons
- 7th Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity on ETS Claim
- All Aspects of Inadequate Medical Need Not Be Exhausted
More from John E Dannenberg:
- California’s “Realignment” Law Sends 38,000 State Prisoners to County Control, Aug. 11, 2016
- Pennsylvania Prisoner Gets $12,500 in Retaliation Suit After Remittitur, Jan. 15, 2010
- Nebraska Muslim Prisoner Wins Religious Concessions, April 15, 2009
- Illegal Strip Searches During Minor Charges Net Sacramento Jail Detainees $1,000 Each, May 15, 2007
- California: Knowing Waiver of Conduct Credits at Plea Agreement Controls Upon Later Probation Violations, May 15, 2007
- Arizona Internet Ban Permanently Enjoined, May 15, 2007
- California: "Mailbox Rule" Extended to Civil Complaints Against Public Entity, May 15, 2007
- California Attorney Richard Dangler Sanctioned for "Shameful, Frivolous" Prisoner Appeals; Resigns, May 15, 2007
- PLN Wins FOIA Suit to Gain Copies of BOP Verdicts and Settlements without Charge, Sept. 15, 2006
- Supreme Court: Banning Publications to Punish Recalcitrant Prisoners Trumps Their First Amendment Rights, Sept. 15, 2006
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Leaves Louisiana Prisoner Waiting for Reinstated Parole, Jan. 15, 2025. Parole, Overdetention, Victim's Rights to Enforce Collection.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces When Deciding Defendant’s Pro Se Motion Requesting Counsel on Postconviction Review, Trial Court Must Either Deny Entire Motion or Permit All Claims If Any Have Arguable Merit, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, After Request for Counsel, Pro Se Issues.
- $25 Million Contempt Fine Prompts Release of Pretrial Detainees from Philadelphia Lockups, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Contempt (Civil Procedure), Bail/Pretrial Release, Fines.
- Indigent Defense: Appointed Counsel Does Not Mean Free Counsel, Dec. 1, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Indigent Defense, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
- In Oregon Case, Ninth Circuit Limits Pretrial Detention Without Counsel to Seven Days, Nov. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Pretrial Detention and Detainees, Speedy Trial Clock - Tolling of.
- Arizona Supreme Court Allows Third PCR Motion Based on IAC for Erroneous Advice About Parole Eligibility Due to ‘Pervasive Confusion’ Regarding Parole Within Legal Community, Nov. 1, 2024. Parole, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Violating Jail Phone Policy Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege, Sept. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney Calls.
- $60,000 Settlement for Kansas Prisoner’s Excessive Force Claim, $578,000 for His Attorneys, Sept. 15, 2024. Attorney Fee Awards, Guard Brutality/Beatings, Settlements.
- Washington Prisoner’s Sentence Vacated After Attorney Calls and Visits Were Recorded, Aug. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Prisoner Privileges, Disclosure of Records, Recordings, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of.
- In New Jersey, Yet More Privileged Phone Calls Between Prisoners and Attorneys Recorded and Used by Prosecutors, July 1, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney/Client, Recorded Calls.