×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Expert Testimony Required in Alaska Medical Suits
Loaded on Nov. 15, 2003
published in Prison Legal News
November, 2003, page 19
The Alaska Supreme Court held that pro se litigants are not entitled to judicial advice as to the ramifications of every decision made during the course of litigation. That court affirmed the trial court's summary dismissal of the pro se plaintiff's medical negligence action.
Filed under:
Injury -- Misc.,
Civil Procedure,
Summary Judgment,
Expert Witnesses.
Location:
Alaska.
James Kaiser was injured at work ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Bloated Prison Budget Fuels California's Degenerative Incarceration Spiral, by John E Dannenberg
- Washington Mail Ruling Published
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Pro Se Tips and Tactics: Magistrate Judges in Federal Courts, by John Midgley
- South Carolina Cuts ACA Accreditation at Four State Prisons, by Lonnie Burton
- World Court Orders U.S. to Stop Executing Mexicans
- Over 600 Prisoners Brutalized by New Jersey Prison Guards, by Gary Hunter
- Texas Doesn't Have to Pay Interest on Trust Fund Accounts
- Court Reporter Jailed for Botching VitaPro Trial Transcripts; Convicted Prison Chief Still Free
- Sexual Abuse at Haltom City Jail in Texas
- Mothers in Prison Losing All Parental Rights, by Ann Farmer
- Inmate Compensation Program Applies to Federal Pretrial Detainees
- Phoenix Sheriff Arpaio Liable for Tent City Assault, Prisoner Awarded $635,532
- Ninth Circuit Judge Investigated for Writing Condemned Prisoner
- Jury Awards $1.75 Million Against CMS in Illinois Jail Suicide
- Kansas Prisoners Denied Credit for Time on Parole
- Expert Testimony Required in Alaska Medical Suits
- 100+ Canadian Prisoners Attempt to Escape from Private Superjail; Racial Profiling Alleged
- Injunction Prohibits Virginia Grooming Policy Enforcement on BOP Prisoners
- Washington Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Negligent Parole Supervision Claim
- First Circuit Reverses 12(b)(6) Dismissal in Jail Rape Case
- Confinement for Nonpayment Without Willfulness Violates Due Process
- Trial Required in Pennsylvania Guard Beating, by John E Dannenberg
- Education in Prison Declines
- Texas Courts Clarify Prisoners' Right to Civil Bench Warrant
- Gay Prisoners Not Entitled to Double-Occupancy Cell
- Unauthenticated Evidence Does Not Support Summary Judgment
- Incarceration Not Grounds for Termination of Parental Rights in Nevada
- $112.50 Per Hour Post-Judgment Attorney Fees Upheld Under PLRA, by Bob Williams
- Eighth Circuit Affirms Damages Award, Discovery Sanctions, Fees in Missouri Pepper Spray Case
- America Without the Death Penalty: States Leading the Way, by Robert Woodman
- Oklahoma Prisoner/Paupers May Be Required to Pay Partial Filing Fee
- Video-Visits Out in New Mexico Prisons, by Gary Hunter
- Arizona Surcharge on Fines Upheld
- Oklahoma Jail Pays $385,000 Settlement in Baby's Death
- Guard Awarded $515,813 Against Private Medical Provider
- Texas Court Abused Discretion by Dismissing Prisoner's Retaliation Suit
- Pepper Spray Drift Injury Can Be Actionable, by John E Dannenberg
- Texas Prisoner Gets 30-Day Grace Period to File Expert Affidavit
- News in Brief
- Sex Offender Registries Asked: Where Are All the Sex Offenders?
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit: Texas Prisoner’s Declaration Alone Sufficient to Send PLRA Exhaustion Dispute to Trial, July 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Summary Judgment/Judgment N.O.V., Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Crime Scene Context: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Reconstruction, April 15, 2024. Expert Witnesses, Expert Witnesses/Testimony.
- Seventh Circuit Says Lack of Expert Testimony Dooms Illinois Prisoner’s Medical Neglect Claim, March 1, 2024. Wexford Health Services, Failure to Treat, Expert Witnesses, Deliberate Indifference.
- One Solution to Jurors Giving Too Much Weight to Improper Forensic Testimony: 4-Minute Training Video Based on DOJ Guidelines, Jan. 15, 2024. Commentary/Reviews, Expert Witnesses, Opinions and Expert Testimony, Opinion on Ultimate Issue.
- Second Circuit Revives N.Y. Prisoner’s Suit Over Sing Sing Fire, 11 Other Prisoners Split $220,000 Settlement, Jan. 1, 2024. Failure to Protect (General), Fire Hazards, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Evidentiary Ruling, Administrative Exhaustion.
- In Suit Over Moldy Cells Causing Fungal Infection, Illinois Warden Denied Summary Judgment Wins Anyway, Dec. 1, 2023. Respiratory, Ventilation, Sanitation, Summary Judgment, Expert Witnesses.
- Maryland Supreme Court: Firearms Identification Methodology Does Not Provide Reliable Basis for Expert’s Unqualified Opinion That Bullets Recovered at Crime Scene Were Fired From Defendant’s Gun, Oct. 1, 2023. Expert Witnesses, junk science, Gun Laws/Crimes.
- No Summary Judgment for Private Transportation Company in Maryland Detainee’s Suit Alleging “Horrific” 2,000-Mile Journey, Sept. 15, 2023. Transport Companies, Transportation, Summary Judgment.
- $20,000 Settlement for Ohio Prisoner’s Slip-and-Fall Injury, May 1, 2023. Injury -- Misc., Failure to Protect (General), Settlements.
- Seventh Circuit: State Court Decision Not Entitled to AEDPA Deference Due to Incorrect Legal Standard, Pro Se Habeas Petition Granted Based on Trial Counsel’s Failure to Present Expert Witness on Determinative Issue of Guilt Resulting in IAC, Feb. 15, 2023. Expert Witnesses, AEDPA, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Per se ineffectiveness.