×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Harsh Pre-trial Conditions of Confinement Justify Reduced Federal Sentence
Loaded on March 15, 2005
published in Prison Legal News
March, 2005, page 32
Harsh Pre-trial Conditions of Confinement
Filed under:
Staff-Prisoner Harassment,
OB/GYN,
Sentencing,
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines,
Mothers in Prison.
Location:
New York.
Justify Reduced Federal Sentence
by Matthew T. Clarke
A New York federal court has held that harsh pre-trial conditions of confinement justify a downward departure in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Jubelequis Mateo, a New York federal prisoner, filed a motion for downward departure under the …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- California Corrections System Officially Declared Dysfunctional" - Redemption Doubtful
- Pay To Play: Guard Union Spreads the Wealth
- New York Jail Settles Strip-Search Suit For $2.7 Million
- Five Florida Cases Remanded for Award of Jail or Prison Credits
- South Carolina Prison Officials Cheat Charity, Attempt Coverup
- Washington Guards Settle Lawsuits For $7,270,000 And $810,000, Lose Third
- Ohio Lawyer Suspended for Promising Favor from Judge for Money
- Harsher Oregon Parole Statute Cannot Be Applied Retroactively
- From the Editor
- Problems Plague Illinois Jails And Prisons, Employees Watch Television for Pay, by Michael Rigby
- Connecticut Woman Gang-Raped In Sheriff's Van Settles Suit For $480,000
- Prison Population Still Rising in Mid-Year 2003
- Exhaustion of Administrative Remedy Requirement May be Excused
- Wrongfully-Convicted Missouri Woman Receives $7.5 Million After 16 Years in Prison
- Judges Of Death, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- U.S. v. Booker: The Left Wing Gives and the Right Wing Takes Away, by David Zuckerman
- Delaware Prisoner's $100,000 Damage Award For Retaliation Upheld
- Fulton County Jail under Federal Control
- 9th Circuit Explains Habeas Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Upholds Washington Transfer to Priv
- NO FTCA or IIED Claims Stated in Oregon Testicular Radiation Case
- Uprising by Vermont Prisoners Damages CCA Prison in Kentucky, by Matthew Clarke
- Destruction of Exculpatory Disciplinary Evidence May Violate Due Process Clause
- New York Jail's Strip Search Policy Permanently Enjoined
- Oregon Ban On Sexually Explicit Mail, Fantasy Games Upheld, State Law Claims Remanded
- Washington Community Custody Sanctions Upheld
- Delaware Prisoner Killed In Hostage Standoff, Counselor Raped
- Summary Judgment Reversed In Los Angeles Jail Over-Detention Suit
- Harsh Pre-trial Conditions of Confinement Justify Reduced Federal Sentence
- Fourth Circuit Reinstates Federal Prisoner's FTCA Claim
- Pennsylvania Statute Banning Sex Between Staff and Prisoners Upheld
- $78,435 in Attorney Fees for Successful Challenge to Pennsylvania's Megan's Law
- PHS and Florida Sheriff Fight Over Liability in Jail Beating Death Suit
- Mailbox Rule Applies to Texas Prisoners Civil Filings
- Civil Punitive Damages On Top Of Criminal Punishment Is Not Double Punishment
- Arizona Appellate Court Vacates Restitution Order In Escape Case
- Idaho Prisoner States Valid Retaliation Claim Against Parole Commission
- Lucasville: The Untold Story of a Prison Uprising, by Karen Thimmes
- Missouri Post-Conviction Proceedings Not Encompassed By PLRA Payment Scheme
- Massachusetts Court Imposes Time Limits For Unrepresented Criminal Defendants
- News in Brief:
- Washington Absconding Does Not Toll LFO Collection Statue
More from these topics:
- Pregnant Women Detained in Jail: The Hideous Story of In-Custody Births, May 1, 2026. Systemic Medical Neglect, OB/GYN, Failure to Treat, Jail Specific, Medical Neglect/Malpractice.
- Nevada Non-Profit Founder Under Investigation for Misconduct, May 1, 2026. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Staff-Prisoner Harassment, Contractor Misconduct, Complaints, Restrictions, discrimination.
- Groundbreaking Statistical Study of Pregnant Texas Jail Detainees Finds Over 400 Monthly, April 1, 2026. Systemic Medical Neglect, OB/GYN, Failure to Treat, Mothers in Prison, Deliberate Indifference.
- Tenth Circuit Holds Prior California Child Pornography Conviction Does Not Trigger Federal Mandatory Minimum Because State Statute Encompasses Conduct Beyond Federal Definition Under Categorical Approach, April 1, 2026. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Qualifying Offenses, Mandatory Minimum Sentence, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Child Pornography.
- SCOTUS Announces Sentencing Reform Act Does Not Authorize Automatic Extension of Supervised Release When Defendant Absconds, Resolving Circuit Split, April 1, 2026. Sentencing, Revocation/Modification of Probation, etc., Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- U.S. Sentencing Commission Report Breaks Down Federal Contraband Sentences, March 1, 2026. Guard Misconduct, Mechanical Searches/Scanners, Statistics/Trends, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Bribery/Extortion/Theft.
- Eleventh Circuit: District Court Erred in Dismissing BOP Prisoner’s Medical Claim, Finds Prison Officials Made Administrative Remedies Unavailable, March 1, 2026. Systemic Medical Neglect, OB/GYN, Failure to Treat, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Deliberate Indifference.
- Wisconsin Hasn’t Created Prison Nursery Program, One Year After Court Order, March 1, 2026. Injunctions, Mothers in Prison, Parental rights, Children of Prisoners.
- Acquitted Conduct Sentencing: Not Guilty – But Punished Anyway, March 1, 2026. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Federal Legislation, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Acquitted Conduct/Uncharged Crimes/Dismissed Counts.
- First Circuit Clarifies Mitigating Role Analysis – Sentencing Courts Must Consider All Identifiable Participants in Drug Shipment, Not Just Crew Members, and Use § 3B1.2 Factors to Assess Relative Culpability, Not Guilt, Dec. 15, 2025. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigating Role/Circumstances/Evidence, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.

