×
You have no more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Willful and Malicious Act Required for Minnesota fficial Immunity Precludes Summary Judgment
On de novo review, the Minnesota Court of Appeals addressed two forms of immunity. The Court first concluded that official immunity can only be granted if the complaint of conduct was discretionary and, if so, officials acted willfully and maliciously. Because this latter question presented a genuine issue of material fact, the denial of summary judgment was affirmed on this ground.
On the defense of sovereign immunity, the Court reversed the denial of summary judgment, concluding that neither Minnesota nor its employees could be sued in their official capacities. See Fisher v. State of Minnesota, Minnesota Court of Appeals, Case No. C3 05 495 (Oct. 17, 2006) (unpublished), 2006 WL 2947530.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Fisher v. State of Minnesota
Year | 2006 |
---|---|
Cite | Minnesota Court of Appeals, 2006 WL 2947530 |
Level | Court of Appeals |
Injunction Status | N/A |