×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Consent to Named Magistrate Does Not Apply to All Magistrates
The court of appeals for the Seventh circuit held that a party consenting
to proceedings before a specific, named magistrate did not constitute
consent to later proceedings before a different magistrate under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c). As a result, the court of appeals held the judgment entered in
this case ...
to proceedings before a specific, named magistrate did not constitute
consent to later proceedings before a different magistrate under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c). As a result, the court of appeals held the judgment entered in
this case ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login