×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Hearing Officer Not Required to Identify Favorable Witnesses
The plaintiff alleged that the tape of his disciplinary hearing was
tampered with to obfuscate a favorable answer from a witness. Since no
tape is required by due process, and the plaintiff got the written
statement setting forth the reasons for decision that is required, there is
no due process …
tampered with to obfuscate a favorable answer from a witness. Since no
tape is required by due process, and the plaintiff got the written
statement setting forth the reasons for decision that is required, there is
no due process …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login

