×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Hearing Officer Not Required to Identify Favorable Witnesses
The plaintiff alleged that the tape of his disciplinary hearing was
tampered with to obfuscate a favorable answer from a witness. Since no
tape is required by due process, and the plaintiff got the written
statement setting forth the reasons for decision that is required, there is
no due process ...
tampered with to obfuscate a favorable answer from a witness. Since no
tape is required by due process, and the plaintiff got the written
statement setting forth the reasons for decision that is required, there is
no due process ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login