×
You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Seizure of MO Escapee's Prison Account Upheld
The Missouri Court of Appeals upheld the confiscation of a state
prisoner's trust fund account after he escaped from work release and
remained at large for a month. The defendant prison officials claimed he
abandoned the funds when he escaped. The trial court granted the
defendants summary judgment in the replevin action brought by the
prisoner, which was affirmed on appeal. See: Wilson v. Schriro, 952 S.W.2d
806 (MO Ct. of Appeals, 1997).
prisoner's trust fund account after he escaped from work release and
remained at large for a month. The defendant prison officials claimed he
abandoned the funds when he escaped. The trial court granted the
defendants summary judgment in the replevin action brought by the
prisoner, which was affirmed on appeal. See: Wilson v. Schriro, 952 S.W.2d
806 (MO Ct. of Appeals, 1997).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Wilson v. Schriro
| Year | 1997 |
|---|---|
| Cite | 952 S.W.2d 806 (MO Ct. of Appeals, 1997). |
| Level | State Court of Appeals |
| Attorney Fees | 0 |
| Damages | 0 |
| Injunction Status | N/A |
10/07/97 ELBERT WILSON v. DORA SCHRIRO
[1] COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT
[2] WD 54276
[3] 952 S.W.2d 806, 1997
[4] October 7, 1997
[5] ELBERT WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
DORA SCHRIRO, ET AL, RESPONDENT.
[6] Appeal From the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri. Honorable Byron L. Kinder, Judge.
[7] Wilson Elbert, Jefferson City, Mo, Party acting Pro Se.
[8] Milton M. Frazier, Esq., Jefferson City, Mo, Attorney for Respondent.
[9] Before: Smart, P.j., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ.
[10] ORDER
[11] PER CURIAM
[12] While in the custody of a work release program, Wilson escaped and remained at large for one month. While at large, his inmate accounts were confiscated because of his abandonment. Wilson filed a replevin action against respondents requesting the return of his money some twenty months after his escape. Defendants moved for summary judgment against Wilson and summary judgment was granted in their favor.
[13] Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[1] COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT
[2] WD 54276
[3] 952 S.W.2d 806, 1997
[4] October 7, 1997
[5] ELBERT WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
DORA SCHRIRO, ET AL, RESPONDENT.
[6] Appeal From the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri. Honorable Byron L. Kinder, Judge.
[7] Wilson Elbert, Jefferson City, Mo, Party acting Pro Se.
[8] Milton M. Frazier, Esq., Jefferson City, Mo, Attorney for Respondent.
[9] Before: Smart, P.j., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ.
[10] ORDER
[11] PER CURIAM
[12] While in the custody of a work release program, Wilson escaped and remained at large for one month. While at large, his inmate accounts were confiscated because of his abandonment. Wilson filed a replevin action against respondents requesting the return of his money some twenty months after his escape. Defendants moved for summary judgment against Wilson and summary judgment was granted in their favor.
[13] Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).