×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Sixth Circuit Outlines Exceptions to Heck Favorable-Termination Doctrine
Loaded on Feb. 15, 2009
published in Prison Legal News
February, 2009, page 46
Filed under:
Disciplinary Litigation,
Public Defenders,
Sentencing,
Wrongful Imprisonment,
Restitution,
Municipal Liability.
Location:
Ohio.
Sixth Circuit Outlines Exceptions to Heck Favorable-Termination Doctrine
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has held the favorable-termination doctrine does not apply to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions brought by prisoners who were foreclosed from challenging their incarceration in a habeas action or who are only challenging the procedures …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Corruption in Orange County, CA Sheriff’s Department Revealed; Sheriff Resigns, Convicted on Criminal Charges, by Marvin Mentor
- Second Chance Act Signed Into Law, But Not Yet Funded, by Brandon Sample
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Private Prison Companies Not Forthcoming About Immigration Detainee Deaths
- BOP Suspends Use of Ion Spectrometry Drug Detection Devices, by Brandon Sample
- Officials Agree To Cap Population at D.C. Jail, by Michael Rigby
- Sixth Circuit Upholds Partial Denial of Qualified Immunity for MI Jail Guards’ Failure to Protect Sex Offender; Case Settles for $190,000
- Jose Medellin Executed; Vienna Convention Controversy Lives On, by Matthew Clarke
- Changes in Texas Parole Laws Violate Ex Post Facto Clause, by Matthew Clarke
- Department of Justice Report on Prison Rape Elimination Act, by Matthew Clarke
- Fifth Circuit: § 1983 Nominal and Punitive Damages Allowed Absent Physical Injury
- Report Criticizes Conditions in U.S. Immigrant Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington, by David Reutter
- Notwithstanding Federal Healthcare Receiver, California Prisoners Can Still Use State Habeas Corpus to Redress Medical Complaints
- Washington DOC Restarts Private Industry Prison Jobs Following State Constitutional Amendment, by John Dannenberg
- Ohio Settles Actual Innocence Claim For $1,500,000
- Alaskan Prisoner in Arizona Can Enforce CCA Contract
- Supreme Court of Canada: No Wage Loss Compensation While in Prison Caused by Sexual Assault by Staff
- GAO Report Critical of BOP’s Methodology for Comparing Costs Between BOP and Private Facilities, by Brandon Sample
- $400,000 Award in Failure to Protect Connecticut Suicidal Prisoner
- BOP Agrees to Provide Wine to Prisoner for Religious Rituals, by Brandon Sample
- Nominal Damages for Atlanta Georgia Jail’s Ban on Magazines, Books and Newspapers
- Utah Sex Offender Internet Registry Statute Violates First Amendment, by Mark Wilson
- Texas Awards Prison Phone Contract, by Matthew Clarke
- Jury Awards Almost $900,000 to Dallas County Jail Stroke Victim, by Gary Hunter
- Alameda County, CA Settles Jail Suicide Suit for $800,000
- Former California Prison Doctor Admits Negligence, Gets Probation; CDCR Medical Care Issues Still Unresolved, by John Dannenberg
- No Private Cause of Action for Businesses Complaining that Competitor Unfairly Used Prison Labor, by John Dannenberg
- More Damages, Costs & Attorney Fees Awarded in NH False Disciplinary Case
- Writ Writer: One Man's Journey for Justice, by David Preston
- Ex-Mayor Returned to Prison After Misleading BOP to Enter Drug Program, by Brandon Sample
- Ninth Circuit: Orange County Jail PLRA Injunction May Not be Terminated as to Ongoing Violations
- Prisoner Litigation Swamps California Eastern District Court; Ninth Circuit Recruits Other Judges to Help, by John Dannenberg
- Kitsap County, Washington Jail Settles Public Records Act Suit for $125,000
- Los Angeles Sheriff Department Report: Prisoner Lawsuits Slowed, But Payouts Grew, by John Dannenberg
- Corpus Christi Pays $50,000 to Settle Jail Prisoner’s Excessive Force Claim
- Washington State Deputy Sheriff Not Entitled to Quasi-Judicial Immunity
- TDCJ Employee Wins $1,505,000 for Texas Prison System’s Failure to Accommodate
- Wisconsin Claims Board Awards Almost $110,000 for Wrongful Rape Conviction, Attorney Fees
- Behavior Modification Training to Become Part of Washington State DOC
- Class Action Disability Discrimination Suit Certified Against Cook County Jail in Illinois
- Oregon Parolee Negligent Supervision Case Reinstated
- $4.5 Million Settlement in New Jersey Jail Strip Search Lawsuit
- Denial of Allocution Right on Supervised Release Resentencing Requires Remand
- Transgender Idaho Prisoner Receives Hormone Therapy Pending Trial
- Governments, Not Prisoners, Must Pay Cost of Transporting Prisoner Witnesses
- Ohio DNA Specimen Law Ruled Not Retroactive
- Unemployment Compensation Denied to Guard Who Failed to Stop Prisoner Assault
- PLRA Requires Grievance Exhaustion for ADA/RA Claims
- Sixth Circuit Outlines Exceptions to Heck Favorable-Termination Doctrine
- California Sex Offender’s Probation Travel Restrictions Abated, by John Dannenberg
- Washington Classification Reassessment Requires Notice and Hearing
- Arbitrator Awards Hawaii Prisoner $7,500 for Injuries Sustained While Working in Kitchen
- Kentucky Jails’ Seizure of Funds for Booking, Room and Board Fees Upheld
- Pennsylvania Prisoner Appointed Counsel on Retaliation / MRSA Infection Claims
- Retroactive Residency Restrictions for Missouri Sex Offenders Unconstitutional, by Matthew Clarke
- Washington Prisoner Suit for “Prevailing Wages” from Private Employer Fails, by John Dannenberg
- News in Brief:
- South Carolina Jail Pays Prisoners $80,000 for Failure to Prevent/Treat MRSA
- No Prison Guinea Pigs: President Obama Should Act Now To Ensure Prisoners Aren’t Used For Medical Research, by Allen M. Hornblum
- Deceased New York Prisoner Wins Barber/Cosmetology Licensing For Ex-Cons
- $1.5 Million Settlement in Alabama Probation Officer's Sex Scandal
More from these topics:
- $11 Million Paid by Boston to Exonerated Prisoner for 37-Year Wrongful Incarceration, Sept. 1, 2026. Settlements, Wrongful Conviction, Wrongful Imprisonment, Monell Liability, Withholding of Exculpatory Evidence.
- California Supreme Court Limits Money Bail for Nonviolent Charges, July 1, 2026. Conditions of Confinement, Sentencing, Due Process, Constitutional Challenges/Law, Pretrial Detention and Detainees.
- Oregon Supreme Court: Jail Credit Statute Focuses Upon Legal Custody Not Physical Custody Location, July 1, 2026. Civil Procedure, Sentencing, Appeals/Appellate Jurisdiction, Criminal Justice, Statutory Construction/Interpretation.
- Louisiana’s Atavistic Approach to Criminal Sentencing and Parole Demonstrates Politicians’ Failure to Learn from Past Mistakes, July 1, 2026. Medical, Conditions of Confinement, Sentencing, Parole, Prisoners' Rights.
- Ninth Circuit Lets Stand Ruling That Federal Prisoners’ Gradually Accumulated Savings Are Subject to Restitution Turnover, June 1, 2026. Restitution, Trust Accounts, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Fines.
- Two More Guards Face Prison Time for Messiah Nantwi Killing, June 1, 2026. Guard Misconduct, Guard Brutality/Beatings, Sentencing, Excessive Force (Wrongful Death), Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- New York Prisoner, Paroled After 25 Years, Exonerated of Crime, June 1, 2026. Wrongful Conviction, Wrongful Imprisonment, Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Prosecutorial Threats, Brady/Giglio/Jencks Act Issues.
- Exonerated Texas Prisoner Entitled to $1.68 Million After 22 Years of Wrongful Incarceration, May 1, 2026. Wrongful Conviction, Wrongful Imprisonment, Actual Innocence/Claim of Innocence, Failure to Consult/Investigate/Raise, Expert and Opinion Testimony.
- SCOTUS Announces Sentencing Reform Act Does Not Authorize Automatic Extension of Supervised Release When Defendant Absconds, Resolving Circuit Split, April 1, 2026. Sentencing, Revocation/Modification of Probation, etc., Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- Oregon Supreme Court Announces Bright-Line Rule Requiring Dismissal Without Prejudice When State Fails to Appoint Counsel for Eligible Criminal Defendant Within 60 Days in Misdemeanor Cases or 90 Days in Felony Cases Post-Arraignment, March 1, 2026. Appointment of Counsel, Public Defenders, Indigent Defense, Constitution, state, Counsel - Right to.

