Albert Gardner filed a petition for habeas corpus arguing that the BOP violated the APA in promulgating a regulation that bars offenders who received a two-point gun enhancement sentence from RDAP early release eligibility. Gardner principally relied upon the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Arrington v. Daniels, 516 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008), which held that the BOP’s categorical exclusion rule was promulgated in violation of the APA. The BOP violated the APA, according to the Ninth Circuit, because it failed to adequately explain its decision to exclude, as opposed to include, offenders from early release.
Disagreeing with the Ninth Circuit, the Third Circuit joined the Eighth Circuit’s opinion in Gatewood v. Outlaw, 560 F.3d 843 (8th Cir. 2009) in holding that “the BOP articulated a sufficient rationale” for its regulation excluding offenders who received a gun enhancement sentence from early release. See: Gardner v. Grandolsky, 585 F.3d 786 (3d Cir. 2009).
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Gardner v. Grandolsky
|Cite||585 F.3d 786 (3d Cir. 2009)|
|Level||Court of Appeals|