Skip navigation

Search

22497 results
Page 1044 of 1125. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 ... 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 | Next »

Case • 2005
to the relevant portion of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1996), [e]very person who . . . subjects, or causes to be subjected . . . any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof ...
Case • 1993
. ROTH, Defendants-Appellees: Jan E. Hughes, AAG, 312/814-2770, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Civil Appeals Division, 100 W. Randolph Street, State of Illinois Center, Chicago, IL 60601, USA. [9 ...
Case • 1992
. at 16. [37] E. Conclusion [38] Like the courts in Morgan and Germany, we see no logical reason why the right of access should not be applied to incarcerated juveniles. We therefore hold ...
Case • 2005
Globe, Apr. 23, 1998; Ralph Ranalli, Ex-FBI Honcho: Agent Tipped Mobsters on Stoolie, Boston Herald, Apr. 23, 1998. [34] E. Martorano's Plea Agreement [35] Long before Martorano agreed ...
Case • 1986
on admissibility will be accorded 'great deference.'" West, 776 F.2d at 174 (citing Medina, 755 F.2d at 1274)). [71] E. Hospital Records [72] Appellants contend that the admission into evidence ...
Case • 2002
is not given to wholly secular institutions that attempt to invoke it solely to avoid Board jurisdiction. Where a school, college, or university holds itself out publicly as a religious institution, "[w]e cannot ...
Case • 2002
applicants." 42 C.F.R. § 435.911(a)(1)-(2). Finally, the agency "must not use the time standards" as "a waiting period." 42 C.F.R. § 435.911(e)(1). Although whether the "reasonable [**25] promptness" clause ...
Case • 2002
during a crime of violence, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(c),(e), and 2113(a),(d). Durham argues that his due process and Sixth Amendment rights ...
Case • 2001
. Ed. 2d 505, 94 S. Ct. 1209 (1974) (plaintiff had twice been threatened with arrest and had witnessed his companion's arrest for violating the challenged statute); DeShawn E. v. Safir, 156 F.3d 340 (2d ...
Case • 2002
] 304 F.3d 874 [4] September 11, 2002 [5] JANE ELLYN BENSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CAL TERHUNE, DIRECTOR; SUSAN E. POOLE, WARDEN, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES. [6] Appeal from ...
Case • 2001
and after a motion for summary judgment has been filed and properly supported, to come forward with some minimal facts to show that the defendant may be liable under the claims alleged. See F.R.Civ.P. 56(e ...
Case • 1994
Professions, at 145 (Walter E. Barton & Charlotte J. Sanborn eds., 1978). [12] To order the disclosure of such information at the expense of the Confidentiality Statement would clearly constitute [*515 ...
Case • 2001
to quasijudicial immunity for enforcing contempt order). [66] *fn5 This opinion has been circulated to the full court before release in accordance with Circuit Rule 40(e). A majority did not favor a rehearing ...
Case • 2001
and will not recur, and they have not shown that their commitment to class-wide relief extends to all of the actions that the plaintiffs challenge in their complaint. E. Creation of a Subclass Finally, as stated ...
Case • 2008
immediate and appropriate corrective action. See, e.g., Watson v. Blue Circle, Inc., 324 F.3d 1252, 1258, n. 2 (11th Cir. 2003). See also 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(e). 9 See Freitag v. Ayers, 468 F.3d 528 (9th Cir ...
Case • 2009
-GEB. Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding. United States v. Kaczynski, 446 F. Supp. 2d 1146, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58141 (E.D. Cal., 2006) OPINION [*1122] HAWKINS, Circuit Judge ...
Case • 2009
. FBI, 41 F.3d 238, 242 (6th Cir. 1994), which reasoned that "[e]ven where there is no evidence that the agency acted in bad faith with regard to the FOIA action itself there may be evidence of bad faith ...
Case • 2009
which demonstrates an exceptionally callous disregard for human suffering. [¶] (E) The motive for the crime is inexplicable or very trivial in relation to the offense. [¶] (2) Previous Record of Violence ...
Case • 2009
6, 2005, defense counsel argued a motion to dismiss the 2002 petition as moot. Counsel observed that "[e]veryone agrees that this petition was supposed to cover the period from 2002 to 2004. Mr ...
Case • 2008
appendix to appellant's brief to include "limited extracts from the record on appeal"; appendix is "not to be considered as a substitute for the record itself"); Supreme Court Rule 6.03(e) (2007 Kan. Ct. R ...
Page 1044 of 1125. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 ... 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 | Next »