Skip navigation

Search

121 results
Page 2 of 7. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next »

Massachusetts Federal Court Dismisses DOC from Prisoner's Rape Suit; Amendment Allowed by On October 24, 2008, a Massachusetts federal court dismissed the claims against prison official defendants (defendants) by a former Massachusetts Department of Corrections (DOC) prisoner who allegedly had between 50 and 100 sexual encounters with a former guard. …
Article • July 15, 2009
California Governor Entitled to Absolute Immunity for Erroneous Review for Prisoner’s Parole Eligibility by Former California Governor Gray Davis is entitled to absolute quasi-judicial immunity for his actions related to the erroneous review of a parole board’s grant of parole, the Ninth Circuit held on April 2, 2008. Donald Miller …
Prohibiting Decorations on Outgoing Envelope Not Violative of RLUIPA by The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that a Texas prison policy that prohibits prisoners from drawing illustrations or messages on envelopes does not violate a prisoner’s rights. Prisoner Robert N. Smithback filed a civil rights action that claimed …
No Appeal of Immunity Defenses if Case Under Advisement by Immunity defenses may not be reviewed by way of appeal when a district court still has the matter “under advisement” before a magistrate judge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided July 23, 2008. Raul Meza sued …
California Prosecutors, Parole Board, State Agencies Entitled to Absolute Immunity in Parole Decisions by The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal has held that prosecutors, parole board members and state agencies are entitled to absolute immunity for participating in or making parole decisions. The Court’s ruling comes in the case of …
ADA Upheld by Fifth Circuit by The ADA is a permissible exercise of Congress' authority under the Fourteenth Amendment to override the Eleventh Amendment. Under City of Boerne, the court must assess whether there is "congruence and proportionality" between the injury to be remedied and the means adopted. That standard …
ADA Valid Exercise of Congressional Authority by The Americans with Disabilities Act is not invalid under the Eleventh Amendment because it is a proper exercise of Congress's authority under 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Unlike the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the legislative record of which lacked examples of modern instances …
ADA Withstands 11th Amendment Challenge by The Americans with Disabilities Act does not violate the Eleventh Amendment. Unlike the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, it is "plainly adapted" as a remedial measure even if it prohibits conduct that may or may not be unconstitutional. Its remedies are not so sweeping that …
Class Certification Denied in Suit by Disabled NM Children Prisoners by The plaintiffs, 16 mentally or developmentally disabled children in state custody, alleged a failure to provide protections and therapeutic services required by federal statutes and Constitution, seeking certification of a class of children "in or at risk of State …
IDEA is Constitutional by The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was valid under 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment and therefore Congress successfully abrogated states' Eleventh Amendment immunity. Alternatively, it provides an unambiguous waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity by clearly conditioning the receipt of federal funds on states' willingness to …
Administrative Exhaustion Required in Alabama HIV/AIDS Class Action Suit by The plaintiffs sued on behalf of themselves and all present and future HIV-positive prisoners in the state prison system, complaining both of their segregation from the general prison population and their exclusion from most programming, and of inadequate medical care. …
Article • May 15, 2008
Court Holds 11th Amendment Doesn't Bar Consent Decree Enforcement by The defendant state officials argued that under the Eleventh Amendment, a consent decree enforcing statutory rights could not be enforced to the extent that decree provisions went beyond the requirements of federal law. Judge Justice doesn't buy it. Lelsz v. …
Sovereign Immunity Not Waived by Federal Extradition Act by The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the Federal Extradition Act does not waive a state's sovereign immunity. This action was filed by St. Charles County, Missouri (County), seeking $5,421.86 from the State of Wisconsin for costs incurred for …
A RE-BIRTH FOR CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION: USING THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TO OVERCOME SECTION 1983 HURDLES AND HOLD GOVERNMENT AND POLICE ACCOUNTABLE by A RE-BIRTH FOR CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION: USING THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TO OVERCOME SECTION 1983 HURDLES AND HOLD GOVERNMENT AND POLICE ACCOUNTABLE A Review of …
Colorado Settles Class Action Prison Disability Discrimination Suit For Over $3 Million by The Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) has settled a class action disability discrimination suit over accessibility inside its state prisons for prisoners with impairments in mobility, hearing, sight and for diabetics. Over $3 million will be spent …
Prisoner Had Standing to Enforce Consent Decree by The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held 265 prisoners of the Arizona Department of Corrections have standing to enforce a 1973 consent decree even though none of those prisoners was a party to the 1973 suit. The court held that prisoners are …
Municipalities and Local Officials "Persons" Under § 1983 by Municipalities and Local Officials "Persons" Under § 1983 The U.S. Supreme Court held, inter alia, that both municipalities and local government officials being sued in their official capacity were "persons" for § 1983 purposes. Female employees of two New York City …
Private Prison Corporation Not Entitled to 11th Amendment or Sovereign Immunity by Private Prison Corporation Not Entitled to 11th Amendment or Sovereign Immunity The U.S. Northern District Court of Texas determined that a private operator of a state prison was not entitled to 11th Amendment and sovereign immunity. Cynthia Proctor, …
Supreme Court Clarifies Limitations on Removed State Law Claims by The plaintiffs filed federal claims and state claims in federal court; the state claims were dismissed on Eleventh Amendment grounds and then refiled in state court, where they were dismissed on limitations grounds. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), the supplemental jurisdiction …
Page 2 of 7. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next »