what - Search | Prison Legal News

Hickey v. Reeder-12 F.3d 754 (8th Cir. 1993)

Case • 1993

or be shot with the stun gun. Deputy Martens testified that Hickey understood the harsh consequences if he did not follow the order to sweep his cell and that "even Inmate Hickey could figure out what ...

Blum v. State-829 P.2d 1247 (AZ App. 1992)

Case • 1992

] In response, appellees state that they do not claim that they have a right to unlimited possession of property. They acknowledge that ADOC has the right to determine what amount of property inmates may have ...

Palmer v. Johnson-193 F.3d 346 (5th Cir. 1999)

Case • 1999

not review in this connection the district court's assessment of what facts are established by or inferable from the evidence. Nor do we have jurisdiction to review the district court's grant of Palmer's ...

Wilson v. U.S. Parole Commission-193 F.3d 195 (3rd Cir. 1999)

Case • 1999

sentence was imposed. (emphasis added). [31] As a rule, a definition which declares what a term means is binding, National City Lines, Inc. v. LLC Corp ., 687 F.2d 1122 (8th Cir. 1982 ...

George v. Badger State Industries-827 F.Supp 584 (WD WI 1993)

Case • 1993

and for what purposes they may be spent within the confines of the prison. 15% of all compensation received by inmates for Prison Industries work is applied to an inmate's release account until the account ...

McIlwain v. Prince William Hospital-774 F. Supp. 986 (ED VA 1991)

Case • 1991

physician" at the Haymarket Correctional Facility at the time, although the record does not establish whether Mathis was the person actually contacted by the treating physician. What is undisputed ...

Watson v. Disabato-933 F. Supp. 390 (D NJ 1996)

Case • 1996

, 115 S. Ct. 2293 (1995). [**9] The Requirements of Due Process Concluding that a prisoner has a liberty interest in parole decisions, the Court must still consider what process is due. To answer ...

Rosenbloom v. Flygare-501 N.W.2d 597 (Minn. 1993)

Case • 1993

, Deputy Sigfrinius repeated the name, Akbar Abdullah, back and forth. Rosenbloom muttered, "What a bunch of assholes." Sigfrinius heard the remark, told Flygare that Rosenbloom had called him an asshole ...

Barger v. Peters-645 NE. 2d 175 (ILL. 1995)

Case • 1995

of greater punishment. In the wake of Collins, that question is not to be answered against what disadvantage may be visited upon the plaintiff class through elimination of the opportunity for early release ...

CMC Men's Advisory Council v. Rowland-939 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1991)

Case • 1991

. denied, 111 S. Ct. 963, 112 L. Ed. 2d 1050 (1991). This "plain meaning rule" is based on the view "that in the vast majority of its legislation Congress does mean what it says and thus the statutory ...

Payne v. Axelrod-871 F.Supp 1551 (ND NY 1995)

Case • 1995

Search On November 9, 1989, two officers, CO White and Sgt. Smith, searched plaintiff's cell. (Cpt PP 16-18 Stinson Aff. 12) There is a dispute as to what then occurred. According to plaintiff, Sgt ...

Ayeni v. CBS Inc.-848 F.Supp 362 (ED NY 1994)

Case • 1994

' of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand [**7] that what he is doing violates that right. . . . In light of the preexisting law the unlawfulness must be apparent." Id ...

Gee v. Ruettgers-872 F. Supp. 915 (D WY 1994)

Case • 1994

and contact the U.S. Attorney General Civil Rights Division if plaintiff "comes up dead." The committee also objected to plaintiff's statement in the letter asking his brother not to tell their mother what he ...

Sealey v. Giltner-116 F.3d 47 (2nd Cir. 1997)

Case • 1997

that Giltner call Richards to testify as to how "he came up with this information I was extorting people and . . . what I was extorting . . . stuff like that." Joint Appendix on Appeal at 146. Giltner declined ...

Boyce v. Ashcroft-251 F.3d 911 (10th Cir. 2001)

Case • 2001

in what is essentially solitary confinement at Florence, and that defendants are punishing him for exercising his First Amendment rights. [17] Analysis [18] The threshold issue is whether ...

Hope v. Pelzer-240 F.3d 975 (11th Cir. 2001)

Case • 2001

test for what actions meet this standard, "the Eighth Amendment 'must draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.' " Id. (citations omitted ...

Subia v. Riveland-15 P.3d 658 (Wash.App.Div.2 2001)

Case • 2001

created an impression that Wieman and Hausner might have instigated the charges against Subia in retaliation for his part in their son's dismissal from employment with the DOC. What was relevant was whether ...

Wallin v. Norman-317 F.3d 558 (6th Cir. 2003)

Case • 2003

allocated for exercise, and that he was denied a pass to go to the medical clinic and nurses' station by Sergeant Borton after returning to his cell block. Although it is unclear what course Wallin's ...

Young ex rel Estate of Young v. Martin-51 Fed.Appx. 509 (6th Cir. 2002)

Case • 2002

involvement. (J.A. at 263.) In so doing, the court ruled that the complaint stated a policy claim against Martin in his supervisory capacity. The court further granted limited discovery as to "what the policy ...

Lewis v. Gagne-281 F.Supp.2d 429 (ND NY 2003)

Case • 2003

, it does not delineate what constitutes 'exhaustion.'" Hock v. Thipedeau, 245 F. Supp. 2d 451, 454 (D.C. Conn. 2003). Courts have repeatedly held that administrative remedies are exhausted through the use ...