Skip navigation

Search

20006 results
Page 700 of 1001. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 ... 997 998 999 1000 1001 | Next »

Case • 1994
process rights arising out of a disciplinary hearing presided over by Defendant on August 16, 1990. Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) on the grounds ...
Case • 1995
. [8] Baron C. Sheldahl, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee. [9] Before: James R. Browning, Thomas M. Reavley,*fn1 and William A. Norris, Circuit ...
Case • 1999
] OPINION [13] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding [14] Argued and Submitted June 7, 1999 ...
Case • 1993
and Mitchell on May 11, 1989. [19] Defendants Coughlin, Kuhlman and Edwards moved on June 13, 1989 for dismissal or summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5), 12(b)(6) and 56 ...
Case • 1991
-APPELLEES. [6] Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Oklahoma. D.C. No. 89-283-C [7] F. Browning Pipestem, Norman, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff-Appellant. [8 ...
Case • 1994
with procedural requirements and refer to other regulations. We therefore conclude that Colorado has not given Templeman a liberty interest in his prison classification. [23] B. Benefits Lost ...
Case • 2003
] Before: Donald P. Lay,*fn1 J. Clifford Wallace, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges. [11] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam [12] FOR PUBLICATION [13] OPINION [14 ...
Case • 2001
by applying the standards set out under Rule 56(c) Fed. R. Civ. Proc. We must first determine if there is a genuine issue of material fact in dispute, and, if not, then we determine if the trial court correctly ...
Case • 2002
from the United States District Court for the District of Montana -- Helena Division. D.C. No. CV-95-62-H-CCL. Charles C. Lovell, Senior District Judge, Presiding. Murphy v. Shaw, 253 F.3d 1151; 253 F.3d ...
Case • 2005
, such as if the complaint alleges the violation of a legal interest which clearly does not exist."*fn2 We review the dismissal of a complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous for abuse of discretion,*fn3 ...
Case • 1991
] Robert C. Fellmeth and Carl K. Oshiro for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Timothy G. Laddish, Assistant Attorney General and Richard F. Finn, Deputy Attorneys ...
Case • 1992
] Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), a district court may grant a motion for summary judgment if all of the information before the court demonstrates that "there is no genuine issue as to material fact ...
Case • 2000
A. RICHARDSON, STEVEN HILL, Plaintiffs - Appellees: Arlene B. Mayerson, Esq., DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, Elaine B. Feingold, Esq, Berkeley, CA. For JOHN ARMSTRONG, JAMES AMAURIC, RICHARD ...
Case • 1976
[ 423 U.S. Page 370] officers; (b) a screening procedure for eliminating frivolous complaints; (c) prompt and adequate investigation of complaints; (d) adjudication of non-frivolous complaints ...
Case • 2002
PENDING APPEAL A motion to stay an injunction pending appeal is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c): When an appeal is taken from an interlocutory or final judgment granting, dissolving, or denying ...
Case • 2001
shots were fired at her, one passing by her ear and the other striking her finger. She then fell backwards. [¶] [Caswell and Englund] ran back to the car and drove off." [18] B. Board's Grant ...
Case • 1977
Defendant is personally identified, this order and decree shall apply to him or his agents, servants, employees, representatives or successors in interest. [18] b. "Medical care" shall mean and include ...
Case • 2000
L. STEWART, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. [6] Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County Cause No. CV 99-20757 The Honorable Barry C. Schneider, Judge ...
Case • 2001
the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. [12] Defendant-Appellant C. O. McDowall appeals the district ...
Case • 2003
SUPERIOR COURT. The Honorable Daniel C. Banina, Judge. Cause No. 49D11-0207-MI-1247. [7] Appellant, Pro Se: Jerry Montgomery Michigan City, Indiana [8] Attorneys For Appellees: Steve Carter ...
Page 700 of 1001. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 ... 997 998 999 1000 1001 | Next »