×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
10th Circuit Vacates Utah Court Access Order
Loaded on Dec. 15, 1995
published in Prison Legal News
December, 1995, page 1
In the November, 1994, issue of PLN we reported Carper v. Deland, 851 F. Supp. 1506 (D UT 1994) which involved a class action suit filed by Utah state prisoners claiming that the DOC's method of providing court access, contract attorneys with no law library access, was constitutionally deficient. The ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- 10th Circuit Vacates Utah Court Access Order
- Denial of Toilet Unconstitutional
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- Opening Legal Mail Violates Access to Courts
- Detainee States Claim for Retaliation and Med Needs
- WI Court Upholds DOC Classification Policy
- Sending State Responsible for Legal Materials
- RFRA Analyzed and Applied in 10th Circuit
- Missouri Ad Seg Damages Award Upheld
- Reversal of Disciplinary Hearing Doesn't Moot Suit
- CA Guard Plants Ammo
- Open Prison Barracks Unsafe
- Iowa Crime Legislation, by Michael Brant
- Job Discrimination States Claim
- Withholding of Legal Papers Illegal
- Guard and Prisoner Get Damages in Beating Trial
- Washington Translation Suit Settled, by Paul Wright
- Detainees May Be Disciplined
- Ohio Prison Doctor Imprisoned
- Ohio Mental Health Decree Entered
- Jail Detainee Entitled to Law Library Access
- South Korean Political Prisoners Protest
- Sexual Harassment Violates Eighth Amendment
- PA Prison Investigated for Corruption; Biggest Shake Down Ever
- TRO Granted in Alaska Sex Offender Registration
- No Change in Michigan Consent Decrees
- Denying Witnesses in Disciplinary Hearings Illegal
- Florida Repeal of Earned Time Law Upheld
- Charging for Medication May Violate Eighth Amendment
- Random Urinalysis Okay
- NJ Prisoners Have Liberty Interest in Staying in Population
- RFRA TRO Granted
- Jury Demand Must Be Timely
- Court Access May Require Counsel
- Contract Physicians Entitled to Qualified Immunity
- Texas Detainee Wins Damages for Ad Seg Placement
- HIV/AIDS in Prison and Jail
- Prisoners Entitled to Rely on Marshalls for Service
- News in Brief
More from these topics:
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces When Deciding Defendant’s Pro Se Motion Requesting Counsel on Postconviction Review, Trial Court Must Either Deny Entire Motion or Permit All Claims If Any Have Arguable Merit, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, After Request for Counsel, Pro Se Issues.
- $25 Million Contempt Fine Prompts Release of Pretrial Detainees from Philadelphia Lockups, Dec. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Contempt (Civil Procedure), Bail/Pretrial Release, Fines.
- Seventh Circuit Lets BOP Restrict Access to Federal Register from Prison in Illinois, Dec. 15, 2024. Court Access, Administrative Procedures Act (State), Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
- Indigent Defense: Appointed Counsel Does Not Mean Free Counsel, Dec. 1, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Indigent Defense, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses.
- In Oregon Case, Ninth Circuit Limits Pretrial Detention Without Counsel to Seven Days, Nov. 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Pretrial Detention and Detainees, Speedy Trial Clock - Tolling of.
- Indiana Supreme Court Clarifies Framework for Determining When Courts May Apply Cash Bail to Public-Defender Costs and to Fines, Costs, and Fees, June 15, 2024. Appointment of Counsel, Costs, Restitution, Bail Bonds.
- Nevada Prisoner Wins Injunction Requiring DOC to Provide Exercise Despite Guard Shortage, Jan. 1, 2024. Staffing, Exercise, Appointment of Counsel, Injunctions (PLRA), Preliminary Injunctions/TRO's, Class Actions, Right to Exercise.
- After Mississippi Supreme Court Announcement, Courts Unprepared to Ensure Poor Defendants Have a Lawyer Throughout the Criminal Process, Dec. 15, 2023. Appointment of Counsel, Counsel - Right to.
- Eighth Circuit: Defendant Facing Revocation of Supervised Release Did Not Knowingly and Voluntarily Waive Right to Counsel Where Appointed Counsel Admittedly Knew Nothing About Case and Advised Choosing Between ‘Big House or the Nut House’, April 15, 2023. Appointment of Counsel, Mental Health, Knowingly and Intelligently, Counsel - Right to.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces Courts Not Required to Address All 11 Brown Factors in Ruling on Defendant’s Motion for Continuance to Change Counsel, Aug. 15, 2022. Appointment of Counsel, Ends of Justice Continuances, Counsel - Effective Assistance of.