×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Recent Significant Decisions
Loaded on March 15, 2002
by Reaves, Jr, Walter M
published in Prison Legal News
March, 2002, page 14
by Walter M .Reaves, Jr. The following is a summary of some of the more significant recent decisions on issues important to prisoners.
Search and Seizure
InUnited States v. Osage, 235 F.
3d 518 (10th Cir. 2000), the Court addressed the scope of a consent to search .The Court held ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Idaho's Prison Labor Scandal, by Silja JA Talvi
- Stun Gun, Four-Point Restraint Use Curtailed in Virginia Prisons
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Washington DOC Settles Wrongful Death Suit for $245,000
- BOP Settles Prisoner Beating/Restraint Lawsuit for $99,000
- Puerto Rico Prison Officials Fined $10 Million
- Res Judicata Dismissal of Texas Prisoner's Suit Reversed
- Third Circuit Holds PLRA Bars Claims for Compensatory Damages
- Hitching Post Unconstitutional, by David Reutter
- Claims Dismissed in First Challenge to BOP Communications Ban
- Prison Coffee and Games: Starbucks and Nintendo Admit Their Contractor Uses Prison Labor, by Erica C Barnett
- No Qualified Immunity for Prison Officials Who Upheld Grievance
- Recent Significant Decisions, by Reaves, Jr, Walter M
- Qualified Immunity Upheld for Probation Officer in HIV Privacy Action
- State Prisons Abrogate Attorney-Client Mail Privilege
- Equitable Tolling May Apply to Administrative Exhaustion
- Pennsylvania's Released Felons Granted Right to Register to Vote
- The Cost of Medical Neglect in Washington Prisons, by Sam Rutherford
- $225,000 Paid in Mentally Ill Prisoner's Death
- $630,000 Plus Paid in Ulcer Related Death
- $180,000 for Loss of Vision in Left Eye
- $25,000 Paid for Misdiagnosed Blood Clot
- $62,000 in Slip and Fall/Medical Neglect/Retaliation Case
- $100,000 for Brain Damaged Prisoner
- $40,000 for Achilles Tendon Injury
- $6,000 for Amputated Ring Finger
- $5,000 Paid for Failure to Treat Iritis
- $8,500 for Surgical Mishap
- $13,500 for Ruptured Appendix
- $15,000 in Allergy/Retaliation Suit
- $250 for Providing Wrong Medication
- $5,000 for Severed Tendon
- $1,500 Paid for Failure to Provide Pain Medication
- $1,500 for Refusal to Treat HIV Positive Cancer Patient
- $1,500 for Failure to Assist Disabled Prisoner
- $1,000 for Unnecessary Appendectomy
- $250 for Lack of Aftercare Following Stroke
- $200 for Providing Wrong Medication
- Inadequate Dental Care Results in Settlement
- Washington DOC Virtually Uninsurable
- New Retaliation Standard Defined
- Pro Se Appellants Must Cite Authority
- NCIA Report Finds Prison Race Statistics Distorted
- New York Court Limits "Son of Sam" Law
- New York Expands "Son of Sam" Law Giving Crime Victims More "Clout", by Lonnie Burton
- PLN Awarded $58,059 in Attorneys' Fees in Oregon Bulk Mail Suit; PLRA Doesn't Apply, Injunction Entered
- New York Failure to Protect Claim Set for Trial: Bilingual Counsel Appointed
- Sixth Circuit Finds Ohio Response to Jewish Prisoner's Hair 'Exaggerated'
- Ohio Appeals Court Allows Prisoner's Request for Past Work Information on Guards
- Arizona Prisoner Adequately Pleaded Section 1983 Claim
- News in Brief
More from Reaves, Jr, Walter M:
- Criminal Law Update, Aug. 15, 2003
- Recent Significant Decisions, March 15, 2002
- Post-Conviction Update, Nov. 15, 2000
- Post Conviction Update, May 15, 2000
More from these topics:
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, Feb. 1, 2025. junk science, Habeas Corpus, Forensic Sciences, Child Abuse/Abusers, Evidence - Admissibility.
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025. Settlements, Habeas Corpus, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail.
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Relief Where Both Trial and Appellate Counsel Provided Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Challenge Indictment for Residential Burglary That Failed to Allege Defendant Illegally Entered a ‘Dwelling’, Jan. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Constitutional Challenges/Law.
- Ninth Circuit Holds District Courts Have No Authority Under Rule 4 of Rules Governing § 2254 Cases to Dismiss Habeas Petition on the Merits, Dec. 15, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Dismissal, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- Ninth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to California Prisoner on Napue Claim Because Prosecution Failed to Correct Informant’s False Testimony That He Did Not Receive Any Benefit In Exchange for His Testimony, Dec. 1, 2024. Informants, Habeas Corpus, Informants and Paid Witnesses, False Testimony.
- Public Defender Files Habeas Petitions for Detainees at “Horrific” Baltimore Lockup, Nov. 15, 2024. Failure to Treat, Conditions of Confinement, Hygiene Supplies, Disclosure of Records, Habeas Corpus.
- Ninth Circuit Denies Habeas Relief to Prisoner Who Invoked Fifth Amendment Right to Counsel During Custodial Interrogation but Made Incriminating Statements to Undercover Informant Posing as Fellow Prisoner Because Right to Counsel Not Violated, Nov. 1, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Counsel - Right to.
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Where Defense Counsel Failed to Understand State Self-Defense Statute Provides Complete Defense to Felony Murder Based on Felon-in-Possession Charge, Oct. 1, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Felon in Possession Statute, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Murder/Felony Murder.
- Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Violating Jail Phone Policy Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege, Sept. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney Calls.