×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Mandamus Available to Review Oregon Disciplinary Orders
Loaded on May 15, 2004
published in Prison Legal News
May, 2004, page 14
The Oregon Court of Appeals held that prison disciplinary orders may be challenged in a mandamus action. The court also held that the trial court erred in imposing previously deferred filing fees.
Filed under:
Disciplinary Hearings,
Disciplinary Litigation,
Mandamus,
Filing Fees,
Habeas Corpus,
Interstate Corrections Compact.
Location:
Oregon.
For many years, Oregon prisoners could challenge certain prison disciplinary orders on judicial review in the Oregon Court …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Prisons Nationwide Fail to Treat HCV Epidemic, by John E Dannenberg
- BOP Doctor Indicted, Pleads Guilty to Sexual Assault, by Bob Williams
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- $50,000 HCV Settlement and New Treatment Protocol Approved in Colorado, by Bob Williams
- Colorado Slammed by West Nile Virus But Ignores Prisoners, by Bob Williams
- Denial of Grievance Forms Excuses Failure to Exhaust
- Florida Work Release Prisoners Ripped Off by Private Transport Company, by David Reutter
- Excessive Heat Still Plagues Baltimore Women Detainees, by Bob Williams
- Another Troubled North Carolina Jail, by Michael Rigby
- Third-Party Beneficiaries Can Enforce Terms of Settlement, by Bob Williams
- Virginia Legislature Awards Wrongfully Convicted Man $1.5 Million
- $13,500 Damages Paid to Two Illegally Detained Washington DOC Prisoners
- Mandamus Available to Review Oregon Disciplinary Orders
- PLRA Physical Injury Rule Applied to Non-Prison Case
- Missed HIV Medication Did Not Create a Serious Medical Need
- Washington Medical Claim Reinstated
- California Rules Violation for "Repeated Pattern" Must Involve Same Offense
- Private Settlement Agreement Prohibits Award of Attorney Fees and Costs, by David Reutter
- County Public Defender Liable for Wrongful Conviction
- Physical Injury Rule Doesn't Bar Strip Search Suit
- Local Rule Cannot Justify Summary Judgment When Factual Dispute Exists, by David Reutter
- Beating Judgment for Jail Affirmed on Appeal; Costs Issue Remanded
- PHS Liable for Denying Insulin to Diabetic New Jersey Jail Prisoner
- New Jersey Prisoners May Confront Accusers in Disciplinary Hearings, by Michael Rigby
- New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds $1.6 Million Harassment Verdict
- Two Level Review Required for Publication Rejection, but Qualified Immunity Granted
- BOP Rule Denying Early Release Eligibility Violates APA
- Certification for Interlocutory Appeal Order Discussed in California Prison Labor Suit
- Discipline Without Notice Violates Due Process; BOP Administrative Exhaustion May Be Excused
- No Ex Post Facto Violation in Forcing Washington Prisoner to Take Stress and Anger Classes
- New Trial Ordered in Washington Strip Cell Conditions Suit
- Pretrial Detainee Has Limited Right to Litigate Civil Matters
- Applicability of FTCA to BOP Causes Circuit Split, by David Reutter
- $15 Million Award for Wrongful Conviction Upheld
- Absence of AEDPA in Texas Law Library May Toll Limitations
- NYPD Commissioner Charged With Stealing $112,733.98 from Jail Prisoner Fund
- Dismissal Sanction for Prisoner's Refusal to Be Deposed Without Court Order Reversed
- Kansas Grievance Procedures Inapplicable in Negligence Action
- Illinois County Necessary Party in Suit Against Elected Official
- Confinement for Willful Failure to Pay LFOs Upheld
- No Crueler Tyrannies: Accusation, False Witnesses, and Other Tyrannies of Our Times, by Robert Woodman
- Texas Monitors Prisoners for-Signs of Al-Qaeda Recruitment
- Virginia Prison Vendors Lose Contracts to Out-of-State Supplier, by Gary Hunter
- BOP Medical Detainees Not Subject to PLRA
- Jailhouse Snitch Enlisted in War on Terrorism Behind Bars, by Bob Williams
- Innocent Ohio Man Paid $750,000 for 10 Years Imprisonment
- Tennessee Officials Pay $450,000 to Settle Lawsuit in Detainee's Murder by Guards, by David Reutter
- Texas Probation Officer Charged With Having Juvenile Probationer's Baby, by Gary Hunter
- $252,000 Awarded in Kansas Prisoner's Suicide
- Ohio Native American Prisoner Granted Injunction to Grow Long Hair, by David Reutter
- Dismissal of Prisoner's Divorce Petition Is Abuse of Discretion
- DOJ Investigation: Conditions in Arkansas Prisons Unconstitutional, by Michael Rigby
- Washington Prisoners Get Credit for Time Spent at Liberty
- Tennessee Supreme Court Holds No Procedural Protection Needed for $5 Fine
- California's New Governor Must Reconsider Former Governor's Parole Reversal, by John E Dannenberg
- Washington Failure to Disclose Prison-Phone-Rate Suit Dismissed, State Supreme Court Grants Review, by Sam Rutherford
- Indiana Appeals Court Allows Prisoner to Sue to Receive Pornography
- News in Brief
- Minnesota Pay-To-Stay Programs Don't Deliver
More from these topics:
- Eighth Circuit Dismisses Federal Prisoner’s Challenge to BOP Denying His Request for Expedited Transfer to Prerelease Custody, June 1, 2026. Release and Reentry, Habeas Corpus, First Step Act, Community Confinement/Home Detention, Credits.
- Sixth Circuit Announces State-Law Exceptions to Appeal Deadlines Preserve “Pending” Status Under AEDPA, Holding Belated-Appeal Procedures Toll Federal Habeas Limitations Period, April 1, 2026. Limitations, Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Appealable Issues/Orders, Failure to Address/Advise Defendant.
- SCOTUS Sides with Federal Prisoner in Habeas Review Case, March 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Mandatory Minimum Sentence, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Predicate Acts/Offenses.
- Alaska Prisoner’s Discipline for Violating Invalidated Rule Tossed, March 1, 2026. Disciplinary Hearings, Access to Media, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Authority and Jurisdiction, Administrative Detention/Segregation.
- SCOTUS Announces Federal Prisoners May Seek Certiorari Review of Authorization Denials Under § 2255(h) and Are Not Subject to § 2244(b)(1)’s Bar on Previously Presented Claims, Feb. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Appealable Issues/Orders, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Courts Have Inherent Authority to Correct Unauthorized Sentences at Any Time Without Habeas Petition, Jan. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, Possession or Use of Firearms, Sentences - Authorized, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of, Effect of Vacatur.
- First Circuit Announces Modification of Juvenile’s Life-Without-Parole Sentence to Parole-Eligible Life Term Constitutes “New Judgment” Under AEDPA, Exempting Second-in-Time Habeas Petition From Gatekeeping Requirements, Jan. 1, 2026. Parole, Habeas Corpus, Life without Parole (LWOP), AEDPA, Juvenile Offenses/Offenders.
- Supreme Court of Maryland Announces Division of Correction Must Immediately Apply Time-Served Credit Against Valid Sentences When Convictions Are Vacated and May Not Toll Execution Pending Reprosecution; New Sentences Arising From New Convictions Take, Jan. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, Overdetention, Effect of Vacatur, Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Alabama Supreme Court Denies DOC’s Improper Venue Objection, Jan. 1, 2026. Defenses, Good Time, Habeas Corpus, Failure to Object, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- DOJ Leaves Louisiana Over-Detention Suit on Life Support, Two Others Granted Class-Action Status, Dec. 1, 2025. Class Certification, Habeas Corpus, Overdetention, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Unlawful Detention.

