×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
No Qualified Immunity for Retaliatory Transfer; Jury Awards $219,000 in Damages
Loaded on Aug. 15, 2006
published in Prison Legal News
August, 2006, page 38
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that a guard is not entitled to qualified immunity for initiating a retaliatory prison transfer against a prisoner who had complained to the guards supervisor that the guard failed to authorize money disbursements to pay the prisoners lawyer.
Filed under:
Retaliation,
Retaliation for Filing Grievances,
Retaliatory Transfers,
Attorney Client,
Qualified Immunity.
Location:
Michigan.
Michigan prisoner Darrell Siggers-El ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Guards Rape of Prisoners Rampant, No Solution in Sight, by Gary Hunter
- I Wake Up in Middle-of-Night Terror, by Erika Huggins
- Prisoner Rape Is Torture, by Stop Prisoner Rape
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Ohio Woman Raped by Guard Awarded $625,000
- European Court of Human Rights Voids UKs Blanket Bans On Prisoner Voting, by Matthew Clarke
- Michigan DOC Improperly Calculated Sentences and Released Prisoners; Officials Fired and Demoted, by Gary Hunter
- California Valdivia Attorneys Awarded $6.5 Million For 12 Years Work, by John E Dannenberg
- Problems Continue In Maryland Prisons and Jails, by Michael Rigby
- Pennsylvania Correctional Industries Overcharges Customers, Stockpiles Cash, Fails Mission, by Matthew T. Clarke
- Georgia Prisoner Beaten By Guard Awarded $22,000
- $100,000 Settlement For Black Oklahoma Prisoner Beaten By White Prisoners
- Texas State Representative Criticized For Helping Prisoners and Families, by Matthew T. Clarke
- Texas Politicians Provided Perks Using Prisoner Slave Labor, by Matthew T. Clarke
- Bubble-Gum Computers in Washington State DOC, by Gary Hunter
- $475,000 Settlement In California Suicide Suit
- California Prison Guards Overtime Doubles to $277 Million
- Transgender Wisconsin Prisoners Continue Hormone Treatment Despite Law, by Michael Rigby
- $365,000 Settlement For Restrained, Untreated Michigan Boot Camp Prisoner
- Armor Correctional Health Services: A New Company Blossoming with Political Payback, by David Reutter
- Ohio Awards $662,000 to Man Wrongly Imprisoned for Rape
- Korean Company Employing Prisoners Receives Coveted Quality Award
- Canadian Prison Sanctioned Skin-Art Saving Society Health Problems, by Gary Hunter
- California DOC Drug Program Funds Squandered, by Marvin Mentor
- Survivors of Texas Jail Suicidee Win $516,000 Against Phone Provider, by Matthew T. Clarke
- North Carolina Prisoner Taps Jails Bank Account for $120,000
- Muslim Prisoner Attacked by Other Muslims May Sue Prison for Failure to Protect, by Marvin Mentor
- Alabama Sheriff Charged With Raiding Jail Food Fund
- EMSA Negligent In Florida Jail Prisoners Death, County Pays $65,000, by Michael Rigby
- $790,000 Settlement In Ulcer Death of Georgia Jail Prisoner
- No Qualified Immunity for Failure to Perform Timely Liver Biopsy, by John E Dannenberg
- Florida District Court Awards Federal Prisoner $829.65 for Lost Property
- Tolling Provision Appeals to NY Personal Injury Action
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Reinvigorates DNA Testing Law, by Matthew T. Clarke
- $769,000 Awarded For Death of Asthmatic Virginia Jail Prisoner
- California Third-Level Administrative Appeals May Be Filed with Prison Appeals Coordinator, by John Dannenberg
- No Qualified Immunity for Retaliatory Transfer; Jury Awards $219,000 in Damages
- Ninth Circuit Holds Prisons Not Immune In ADA and RA Suit
- Ohio Pre-S.B. No. 2 Indeterminately Sentenced Prisoners Who Took a Plea are Entitled to Meaningful N, by John E Dannenberg
- RLUIPA Bars Total Ban on Melanic Literature
- Alabama Clarifies Prisoners Right to Call Witnesses At Disciplinary Hearing, by Matthew T. Clarke
- Washington Courts Authority to Order Community Custody Limited
- California Supreme Court Resolves Conflict From Concurrent Sentences With Different Credit Earning R, by John Dannenberg
- News in Brief:
- Actual Innocence Required in Washington Criminal Malpractice Actions
More from these topics:
- First Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Massachusetts Officials Who Held Prisoner in Solitary for Two Years Without Hearing, Sept. 15, 2024. Qualified Immunity, Control Units/SHU/Solitary Confinement, Hearings.
- Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Violating Jail Phone Policy Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege, Sept. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney Calls.
- Unintended Consequence of Texas Prisoner Tablets: Retaliation from Fellow Prisoners, Aug. 15, 2024. Retaliation, Informants, Electronic Tablets, Securus.
- Florida Jail Chief’s Firing Upheld, Retaliation Lawsuit Headed to Trial, Aug. 15, 2024. Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Consequences of Firing Appointed Counsel.
- Washington Prisoner’s Sentence Vacated After Attorney Calls and Visits Were Recorded, Aug. 15, 2024. Attorney Client, Prisoner Privileges, Disclosure of Records, Recordings, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of.
- The Catch-22 of Qualified Immunity, Aug. 15, 2024. Police Misconduct, Qualified Immunity, Immunity - Absolute and Qualified.
- SCOTUS Clarifies Nieves Exception to Lack of Probable Cause Requirement for First Amendment Retaliatory-Arrest Claim Does Not Require ‘Virtually Identical and Identifiable Comparators’, Aug. 1, 2024. Retaliation, Probable/Proximate Cause, Arrest/Arraignment, Court of Claims.
- Third Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity to Pennsylvania Jail Guards and PrimeCare in Detainee’s Overdose Death, July 1, 2024. Primecare Medical, Drug Overdose, Qualified Immunity, Medical Neglect/Malpractice.
- Sixth Circuit Revives Ohio Prisoner’s Retaliation Claim That Guards Got Him Kicked Out of Religious Group, July 1, 2024. Religious Discrimination, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, RLUIPA.
- In New Jersey, Yet More Privileged Phone Calls Between Prisoners and Attorneys Recorded and Used by Prosecutors, July 1, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney/Client, Recorded Calls.