Skip navigation

Search

186 results
Page 4 of 10. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next »

Article • August 15, 2008
Consent Decree Not Final Judgment for Appeal by A consent decree addressing the rights of the institutionalized mentally retarded provided for the appointment of a monitor, to end on a date certain unless extended by court order. The court extended the term for three years. The order is not a …
Article • August 15, 2008
Lack of Funding No Defense for Bad Prison Conditions by The defendants were held in contempt in an earlier opinion for massive violations of a consent judgment. The defendants have taken sufficient measures, mainly alleviation of crowding (which the court terms the "bad seed" of many constitutional violations) to the …
Article • August 15, 2008
No One Liable for Denial of Medical Care to Houston Jail Asthmatic by The plaintiff was arrested and arrived at the police station having an asthma attack. She asked to see a doctor and was told that the clinic was closed. She said she was not medically screened; the clinic …
Article • August 15, 2008
Post Monitoring Fees Allowed in Institutional Reform Suits by At 1344: "In complex institutional litigation that often entails extensive remedial efforts over a long period of time, it is generally accepted that prevailing plaintiffs are entitled to post-judgment fee-and-expense awards for legal services necessary for securing compliance with, and reasonable …
Article • August 15, 2008
State Consent Decree Valid Despite Governor’s Objection by The state submitted a consent decree to plaintiffs and agreed to several changes; the day before it was to be presented to court, the Assistant AG repudiated it at the direction of the Office of the Governor, which had just learned of …
Article • August 15, 2008
Kansas Prison Double Bunking Approved if ACA Standards Met by Thomas Porter and other Kansas state prisoners filed suit against the state and prison officials (defendants) alleging prison overcrowding, and subsequently objected to a proposed increase in the prison population by double bunking. The action alleged too little space per …
Article • May 15, 2008
Second Circuit Discusses Consent Decrees by The court recites boilerplate about consent judgments: they are judicial orders and contracts, to be read "within [their] four corners"; a court can't replace consent decree terms with its own, even if that would help effectuate the decree's goals; courts' equitable power exists only …
Article • May 15, 2008
Fines for Consent Decree Non-Compliance are Criminal, Require Jury Trial by The district court fined D.C. $5.1 million for noncompliance with a consent decree governing treatment of the mentally retarded, which requires placement in community institutions and payment of vendors within 30 days following submission of acceptable vouchers. The nonpayment …
Article • May 15, 2008
Court Holds 11th Amendment Doesn't Bar Consent Decree Enforcement by The defendant state officials argued that under the Eleventh Amendment, a consent decree enforcing statutory rights could not be enforced to the extent that decree provisions went beyond the requirements of federal law. Judge Justice doesn't buy it. Lelsz v. …
Court Terminates 1975 Minnesota Disciplinary Hearing Consent Decree by The court terminates 1975 consent judgment concerning disciplinary due process At 1007: A "Federal right" does not include rights established by consent decrees There is no evidence of current or ongoing violations Plaintiffs suggested that further investigation might uncover some, but …
Article • October 15, 2007 • from PLN October, 2007
Old Media Access Consent Decrees Violated in Maine by Lance Tapley The Maine Department of Corrections has been violating at least two of three 35-year-old federal court orders that grant prisoners access to the press, allow them to write to newspapers, and prohibit prison officials from arbitrarily transferring prisoners out …
Article • June 15, 2007 • from PLN June, 2007
The Political Economy of Prison and Jail Litigation by Margo Schlanger by Margo Schlanger* This article explores the practical effects of the prisoner civil rights docket on conditions of incarceration for the 2.2 million people in American jails and prisons on any given day.1 The analysis takes on a great …
Landmark Settlement Reduces SHU Time, Increases Treatment Of New York Prisoners With Mental Illness by by Betsy Sterling After five years of litigation and two weeks of trial, the New York State Department of Correctional Services and Office of Mental Health have agreed to a settlement that establishes major improvements …
Prisoner Had Standing to Enforce Consent Decree by The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held 265 prisoners of the Arizona Department of Corrections have standing to enforce a 1973 consent decree even though none of those prisoners was a party to the 1973 suit. The court held that prisoners are …
Article • May 15, 2007
Third-Party Prisoners Have Standing to Enforce Consent Decree; ADOC Bound By Decree Until Modified by Third-Party Prisoners Have Standing to Enforce Consent Decree; ADOC Bound By Decree Until Modified The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held Arizona Prisoners not parties to a 1973 consent decree had standing to enforce that …
Article • May 15, 2007
Settlement's Retention of Jurisdiction for Enforcement is Functional Equivalent of Consent Decree by Settlement's Retention of Jurisdiction for Enforcement is Functional Equivalent of Consent Decree The Eleventh Circuit of Appeals has held a Florida settlement agreement's provision that retains "the district court's jurisdiction for enforcement of the agreement" is the …
Officials Not Qualifiedly Immune In Paralyzed Prisoner's Suit by The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey held that county and jail officials were not entitled to qualified immunity in a paralyzed prisoner's civil rights suit. Timothy Ryan was arrested for a traffic violation and held at the …
No Qualified Immunity For Prison Officials In Paralyzed Prisoner's Suit by The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey held that prison officials were not entitled to qualified immunity in a paralyzed prisoner's civil rights suit and that fact issues precluded summary judgment. Timothy Ryan was arrested for …
Police Union Allowed to Intervene in U.S. Brutality Suit by The federal government brought suit about excessive force and improper arrests and searches by the city police, and the parties submitted a proposed consent degree. The police union and various community groups (inter alia, the SCLC, the ACLU, and Homeboy …
Article • May 15, 2007
Private Contractors Bound by State Consent Decree by A consent decree between Medicaid patients and the state is binding as a matter of due process upon HMO's who were agents of the state and contracted with it, where their contracts acknowledged that additional appeal process guidelines might be developed and …
Page 4 of 10. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next »