Skip navigation

Search

1229 results
Page 58 of 62. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 | Next »

Article • August 15, 1997 • from PLN August, 1997
PLRA 'Physical Injury' Requirement Affirmed by In the first published case on this issue, a federal district court in Indiana held that a provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), requiring "physical injury" before a prisoner's lawsuit can proceed, mandated dismissal of prisoners' claim that they were exposed to …
Article • August 15, 1997 • from PLN August, 1997
District Courts Responsible for PLRA Appeal Fees by The court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that a district court erred when it refused to rule on a prisoner's motion to proceed on appeal with In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status, i.e., without pre-paying the filing fees. Prisoners seeking "to …
PLRA Physical Injury Requirement Defined by The court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) physical injury requirement for prisoners seeking money damages is the same as the standard used in determining eighth amendment claims. This ruling is significant because it is the …
Article • August 15, 1997 • from PLN August, 1997
PLRA Filing Fees Don't Apply to Habeas by The court of appeals for the Fourth and District of Columbia circuits held that the filing fee provisions of the PLRA do not apply to habeas corpus petitions filed by prisoners. These courts agreed with all other circuits, the second, third, fifth, …
Article • August 15, 1997 • from PLN August, 1997
Fifth Circuit Applies Three Strikes Provision by The court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which does not allow IFP status to prisoners who have had three or more suits dismissed as frivolous or for failing to state a claim, is constitutional. The court …
Article • August 15, 1997 • from PLN August, 1997
Filed under: PLRA, Filing Fees (PLRA), Parole
Fourth Circuit Affirms PLRA IFP Provisions in Parole Suit by The court of appeals for the fourth circuit held that changes to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), which requires prisoners to pay full filing fees in all civil litigation, are constitutional. Gary Roller, a …
Physical Injury Requirement Not Retroactive by A federal district court in New York held that 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e), a section of the PLRA which requires prisoners to sustain physical injury before they can seek money damages, is not retroactive to claims arising before the PLRA's April 26, 1996, enactment. …
Article • July 15, 1997 • from PLN July, 1997
Administrative Exhaustion Requirements Not Retroactive by The court of appeals for the sixth circuit held that 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), which requires prisoners to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court do not apply to cases pending on April 24, 1996, when the PLRA was signed into law, …
Article • July 15, 1997 • from PLN July, 1997
Filed under: PLRA, Filing Fees (PLRA)
6th Circuit Upholds PLRA IFP Provisions by The court of appeals for the sixth circuit rejected the first extensive constitutional challenge made to the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). The PLRA changes to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the IFP statute, were detailed in …
Article • July 15, 1997 • from PLN July, 1997
Automatic Stay Provisions by After a federal district court in Michigan found the Michigan DOC guilty of contempt for not complying with prior judicial orders on the prisoners' court access and educational opportunities, see: Glover v. Johnson, 934 F. Supp. 1360 (ED MI 1996), the defendants moved to immediately terminate …
Article • July 15, 1997 • from PLN July, 1997
PLRA Filing Fees Not Applicable to Habeas by The tenth and eleventh circuit courts of appeals held that the PLRA's filing fee requirements for indigent prisoners do not apply to habeas corpus petitions. The five other circuits to consider this question have reached the same result. Thus, indigent prisoners need …
Consent Decree Termination by A federal district court in Indiana heard a motion by Lake County officials to dissolve a consent decree governing jail conditions. The motion sought immediate termination of the decree pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(2) and (3). The court gave an extensive discussion to the history …
Article • July 15, 1997 • from PLN July, 1997
Filing Fees Required in Civil Mandamus by The court of appeals for the tenth circuit held that the PLRA's filing fee requirements apply when a prisoner litigant seeks a writ of mandamus in an ongoing civil suit. The court did not discuss whether this applied to writs of mandamus in …
Article • July 15, 1997 • from PLN July, 1997
PLRA Doesn't Apply to Immigration Detainees by The court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) does not apply to immigration detainees. Anthony Ojo was convicted of a drug offense, sentenced to five years in prison and after completing that sentence the Immigration …
Article • June 15, 1997 • from PLN June, 1997
Sixth Circuit Issues PLRA IFP Order by On February 4, 1997, Boyce Martin, chief judge of the sixth circuit, issued an administrative order directing all circuit and district court judges in the sixth circuit to apply the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) uniformly …
Article • June 15, 1997 • from PLN June, 1997
Massachusetts Court Avoids Ruling on Consent Decree Termination by A federal district court in Massachusetts avoided ruling on the constitutionality of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) provisions requiring immediate termination of jail and prison consent decrees, 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(2), by refusing to vacate a jail consent decree but …
No Frivolousness Review Allowed When Filing Fee Paid by The court of appeals for the eighth circuit held that a district court erred when it dismissed portions of a pro se prisoner's complaint after the filing fee had been paid. The lower court also erred when it instructed the defendants …
Article • June 15, 1997 • from PLN June, 1997
Fifth Circuit Holds that PLRA Requires Fees in All Pending Cases by In two separate rulings, the court of appeals for the fifth circuit held that litigants must pay the filing fees in all civil cases pending on the date the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) was signed into law …
Article • June 15, 1997 • from PLN June, 1997
Ninth Circuit: PLRA Doesn't Apply to Habeas by The court of appeals for the ninth circuit held that the filing fee requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) do not apply to habeas corpus proceedings. "We... hold that the forma pauperis provisions of the PLRA relating to prisoner civil …
Article • June 15, 1997 • from PLN June, 1997
PLRA Not Enough for Fourth Circuit by One of the PLRA's stated purposes was to cut down on "frivolous" prisoner litigation by requiring full payment of filing fees and imposing a "three strikes" limitation on prisoners who have had more than three suits dismissed for being frivolous or not stating …
Page 58 of 62. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 | Next »