Skip navigation
Prison Legal News
× You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.

PLRA Fee Requirements Not Applicable to Pending Suits

Loaded on May 15, 1997 published in Prison Legal News May, 1997, page 10
Filed under: PLRA, Filing Fees (PLRA). Location: California.
PLRA Fee Requirements not Applicable To Pending Suits

A federal district court in California held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) In Forma Pauperis (IFP) filing fee provisions are not retroactive to suits filed before the law's April 26, 1996, enactment. Tenance Rodgers, a California state prisoner, filed suit ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. US Supreme Court: Oklahoma Pre-Parole Program Requires Hearing Before Removal
  2. California PIA Employees Lose Minimum Wage Suit
  3. Consent Decrees Create Enforceable Right
  4. Notes from the Unrepenitentiary: " Schooling the generations in the politics of prison", by Laura Whitehorn
  5. Matter of Fact
  6. Sixth Circuit Defines Legal Mail
  7. PLRA Codifies Injunction Standards in Conditions Case
  8. PLRA Applied to Released Prisoners
  9. Indiana Muslim Consent Decree Vacated under PLRA
  10. PLRA Allows Sua Sponte Dismissal
  11. PLRA Fee Requirements Not Applicable to Pending Suits
  12. PLRA Confuses Courts; Applies Only to Prisoners
  13. Ninth Circuit Affirms BOP Sentence Reductions
  14. Drug Policy as Social Control, by Noam Chomsky
  15. Virginia Warden Stabbed, by Dan Pens
  16. Should Prisoners Have the Right to Strike? Some Union Leaders Say "Yes!", by Phil Wilayto
  17. Texas Prisoners Get Second-Rate Doctors
  18. New Jersey Prison Guard Recruiting for KKK
  19. Update on Washington Money Seizure Suit, by Paul Wright
  20. Democracy, Racism and Disenfranchisement
  21. Reviews
  22. Illinois DOC Phone System Upheld
  23. Moors Settle with Indiana DOC
  24. Seventh Circuit Questions ADA Applicability to Prisons
  25. Disciplinary Finding Must Be Supported by Reliable Evidence
  26. Qualified Immunity for Infraction Suit
  27. No Care for STD Violates Eighth Amendment
  28. $1.65 Million Jury Verdict in Cell Assignment Case Affirmed
  29. Racial Rioting Erupts in L.A. Jail
  30. Mental Unhealth and Prisons, by E.D.
  31. Guard Tower Scam, by A.L.
  32. Do the Math, by E.D.
  33. News in Brief
  34. RFRA Allows Redaction of Religious Publication
  35. TRO Granted in DC Smoking Suit
  36. Washington EFV Ban Upheld
  37. $75,000 Jury Verdict in Prisoner Attack Affirmed

More from these topics: