Skip navigation

Search

133 results
Page 6 of 7. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next »

Article • January 15, 2002 • from PLN January, 2002
En Banc Third Circuit Rules on PLRA Three Strikes by In a 134 en banc decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals abandoned its prior interpretation of the "imminent danger" exception to the PLRA's "three strikes" rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and adopted the interpretation given to the phrase by …
Article • January 15, 2002 • from PLN January, 2002
PLRA Screening Applies Regardless of Fee Status by The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) screening and dismissal provisions apply even when the prisoner is not proceeding in forma pauperis . Federal prisoner Gerald Plunk filed a Bivens action alleging that he was …
Article • August 15, 2000 • from PLN August, 2000
Jail Discrimination Violates Equal Protection by The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that different treatment of similarly situated prisoners because of their race, states an equal protection claim. In 1998, Ricky L. Powells, a black prisoner, filed three separate lawsuits alleging that several defendants violated his rights …
Article • February 15, 2000 • from PLN February, 2000
"Three Strikes" Provision of PLRA Unconstitutional by A federal district court in Arkansas held that a prisoner had standing to challenge the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) on equal protection grounds, and that "strict scrutiny" analysis applied. As a result, the provision was declared unconstitutional. …
Article • February 15, 2000 • from PLN February, 2000
No Filing Fee Required if IFP Denied in DC Circuit by No Filing Fee Required if IFP Denied in DC Circuit: Reflecting a widening split between the circuits on this issue, the court of appeals for District of Columbia circuit held that when prisoner plaintiffs are denied In Forma Pauperis …
Article • February 15, 2000 • from PLN February, 2000
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Three Strikes by The court of appeals for the Tenth circuit held that under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), which prohibits IFP status for prisoner litigants that have had three or more suits dismissed as frivolous, malicious or for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be …
A Guide to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, by John Boston (Review) by Paul Wright Review by Paul Wright The passage of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) in 1996 has significantly changed many aspects of prison and jail litigation. The PLRA makes it increasingly difficult for prisoner plaintiffs to …
Article • September 15, 1999 • from PLN September, 1999
Third Circuit Holds 28 USC § 1915(g) Does Not Apply Retroactively by Third Circuit Holds 28 USC § 1915(g) Does Not Apply Retroactively The court of appeals for the Third circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) does not allow courts to revoke the In Forma Pauperis status of litigants …
Article • September 15, 1999 • from PLN September, 1999
Three Strikes Upheld by Ninth Circuit by The court of appeals for the Ninth circuit upheld the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Section 1915(g) generally denies in forma pauperis status to prisoner litigants that have had more than three lawsuits dismissed as frivolous, malicious or for failing to state …
Article • September 15, 1999 • from PLN September, 1999
State Court Dismissals Don't Count as Strikes by A federal district court in the District of Columbia held that the dismissal of frivolous suits in state courts do not count as "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Section 1915(g) prohibits in forma pauperis status for prisoner litigants that have had …
Article • June 15, 1999 • from PLN June, 1999
Imminent Danger Overrides Three Strikes by The court of appeals for the Third Circuit held that conditions allegedly resulting from a vent emitting particles of dust and lint into a cell constitute a serious physical injury for purposes of circumventing the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act …
Prisoner Must Show Imminent Danger at Time of IFP Request to Avoid PLRA Three-Strikes Dismissal by The court of appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that a prisoner who is subject to the three-strikes provision in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) must show that he is under imminent …
Article • March 15, 1999 • from PLN March, 1999
PLRA "Three Strikes" Provision Upheld and Discussed by PLRA "Three Strikes" Provision Upheld and Discussed The ostensible purpose of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) was to curtail frivolous litigation by prisoners. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) was enacted which does not allow In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status for prisoners that …
Article • January 15, 1999 • from PLN January, 1999
Guard's Death Threats May Violate Eighth Amendment by The court of appeals for the District of Columbia (DC) Circuit held that a guard's death threats to a prisoner stated a claim under the Eighth amendment. The court also held that the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the Prison Litigation …
Physical Injury Requirement Inapplicable to First Amendment Claims by The court of appeals for the Ninth circuit held that the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) does not apply to cases pending at the time of the law's enactment and that the PLRA's physical injury requirement …
Article • November 15, 1998 • from PLN November, 1998
No Refund of PLRA Fees by The court of appeals for the Seventh circuit held that the In Forma Pauperis (IFP) provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) are constitutional and prisoners do not get a refund of the partial filing fees they pay if they later refuse to …
Two Year Limitations on Illinois § 1983 Suits by The court of appeals for the seventh circuit held that a district court erred in dismissing a prisoner's lawsuit because it had miscalculated the statute of limitations. The court also held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the "Three Strikes" provision of …
Article • September 15, 1998 • from PLN September, 1998
Three Strikes Doesn't Apply to Pending Cases by Three Strikes Doesn't Apply to Pending Cases: The court of appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which prohibits In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status for prisoners that have had three prior suits dismissed as frivolous, does not apply …
Article • July 15, 1998 • from PLN July, 1998
PLRA Three Strikes Ruling Vacated by In the February, 1997, issue of PLN we reported Lyon v. Vandekrol , 940 F. Supp. 1433 (SD IA 1996) where a federal district court held that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), section 804 of the PLRA, violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. …
Article • June 15, 1998 • from PLN June, 1998
Some PLRA Fee Questions Answered by the Seventh Circuit by The court of appeals for the seventh circuit held that once a trial court determines that an appeal is taken in bad faith, a prisoner is disqualified from proceeding in forma pauperis on appeal. Any subsequent appeal, if determined to …
Page 6 of 7. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next »