×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
"Three Strikes" Provision of PLRA Unconstitutional
Loaded on Feb. 15, 2000
published in Prison Legal News
February, 2000, page 21
A federal district court in Arkansas held that a prisoner had standing to challenge the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) on equal protection grounds, and that "strict scrutiny" analysis applied. As a result, the provision was declared unconstitutional.
Filed under:
Filing Fees (PLRA),
Frivolous Litigation (PLRA),
Civil Procedure,
Standing,
Parole.
Location:
Arkansas.
In April 1997, Arkansas state prisoner Wendell …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- California Guards Abuse Young Prisoners, by Willie Wisely
- Georgia Prisoner Wins $60,000 Retaliation Verdict
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Reviews: Legal Research: How to Find & Understand the Law, 7th ed., by Allan Parmelee
- Reviews: Finding the Right Lawyer, by Allan Parmelee
- Prisoners' Guerrilla Handbook to Correspondence Programs in the U.S. and Canada: High School, Vocational, Paralegal and College Courses, by Paul Wright
- Reviews: Voices From Within the Prison Walls, by Rick Card
- Federal Criminal Defendant's Handbook: Negotiating the Long, Lonely Road from Arrest, to Prison, to Freedom, by Paul Wright
- Enemies of the State: A Frank Discussion of Past Political Movements, Victories and Errors and the Current Political Climate for Revolutionary Struggle Within the USA, by Paul Wright
- A Matter of Law, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- Amended Arizona Statute of Limitations Not Retroactive
- Habeas Challenging Transfer to Private Prison Dismissed
- Abuse of Force at Virginia's Supermax, by Dan Pens
- Tenth Circuit Clarifies Three Strikes
- Wisconsin Release Account Used to Pay Filing Fees
- Warden Purged of Contempt
- Litigation Costs Not Dischargeable in Bankruptcy
- PLRA Doesn't Apply to Civil Commitments
- 28 U.S.C. § 1915A Applies to All Prisoner Suits
- Filing Fee Refunded in Habeas Case
- No Filing Fee Required if IFP Denied in DC Circuit
- Prison Guard Golf Tourney Tees off Town
- Washington Prison Slavery Runs Competitors Out of Business, by Paul Wright
- Water Jet Companies Challenge Washington Slave Labor Laws
- Sylvia Baraldini Goes Home After Sixteen Years, by Julia Lutsky
- Torture "Aberrational" in U.S.
- Israeli Supreme Court Limits Torture
- Michigan DOC Settles DOJ Sexual Abuse Lawsuit, by Maia Justine Storm
- Prison Health Services Refuses to Pay
- Judicial Screening Applies Only to IFP Suits
- Lack of Evidence Bars Disciplinary Finding of Guilt
- Delay in Treating Injured Shoulder States Claim
- America's Toughest Sheriff Settles for $8.25 Million in Wrongful Death Suit
- Prison Realty Hires PR Firm
- "Three Strikes" Provision of PLRA Unconstitutional
- Florida State Prison Halloween Melee
- Constitutionality of ADA Upheld by Fourth Circuit
- Cell Feed Status May Give Jailer Actual Notice of Need to Protect Prisoner
- New Jersey Sex Offender Porn Ban Upheld
- PLRA Administrative Remedy Exhaustion Requirement Not Retroactive
- New York Parole Board Commissioner Convicted, by Julia Lutsky
- Nine Florida Guards Injured in Scuffle
- Whitestone Foundation
- Oregon DOC Liable for Attacks by Parolees
- Miscarriage is Serious Medical Condition
- Indigence is Cause to Retax Costs
- Notice of Summary Judgment Requirements Mandatory
- News in Brief
More from these topics:
- Eleventh Circuit Revives Pro Se Litigant’s § 1983 Lawsuit Despite His Three Strike Status Under the PLRA, Oct. 1, 2026. Filing Fees (PLRA), Frivolous Litigation (PLRA), Complaints, Abuse of Discretion Standard, Pro Se Issues.
- Oregon Supreme Court: Jail Credit Statute Focuses Upon Legal Custody Not Physical Custody Location, July 1, 2026. Civil Procedure, Sentencing, Appeals/Appellate Jurisdiction, Criminal Justice, Statutory Construction/Interpretation.
- Louisiana’s Atavistic Approach to Criminal Sentencing and Parole Demonstrates Politicians’ Failure to Learn from Past Mistakes, July 1, 2026. Medical, Conditions of Confinement, Sentencing, Parole, Prisoners' Rights.
- California Appeals Court Sustains Amendments to CDCR that Narrow Youth Parole Eligibility Rules, July 1, 2026. Parole, Equal Protection Clause/Claims, Juvenile Offenses/Offenders, Credits, Prison Regulations.
- Sixth Circuit Rules Prisoner Held After Parole Board Ordered Release on Parole Could Not State a Rights Violation Claim, June 1, 2026. Parole, Overdetention, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights.
- California Spends $300 Million Each Year Incarcerating Senior Citizens in Women’s Prisons, April 1, 2026. Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Totality of Conditions, Parole, Life without Parole (LWOP), Americans with Disabilities Act.
- Eighth Circuit Rules Iowa Prisoner’s Adverse Summary Judgment Is Not a “Strike”, March 1, 2026. Filing Fees (PLRA), Frivolous Litigation (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness), Access To Courts.
- Colorado Law Intended to Reduce Prison Population Hasn’t Improved Conditions, March 1, 2026. Overcrowding, Parole, halfway houses, Reduction of Prison Population.
- Maine Was the First State to Abolish Parole. Incarcerated Mainers, Advocates Hope to Bring it Back., March 1, 2026. Rehabilitation/Recidivism, Parole, Post-release, ex-offender, re-entry, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, De Facto Life Sentence.
- Colorado Lawmakers Approve Prison Bed Funding, Despite DOC Understaffing, March 1, 2026. Overcrowding, Staffing, Parole, Overdetention, Reduction of Prison Population.

