×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
No Immunity for Washington Religious Name Retaliation
Loaded on July 15, 1996
published in Prison Legal News
July, 1996, page 9
The court of appeals for the ninth circuit held that prisoners have a clearly established right to use legally adopted religious names and prison officials were not entitled to qualified immunity for violating that right. The court also held such prisoners did not have a clearly established right to notary …
Filed under:
Qualified Immunity,
Mail Regulations,
Religious Freedom,
Religious Names.
Location:
Washington.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Prison Litigation Reform Act Passed, by Paul Wright
- Zimmer Amendment Passed
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Double Justice: A Documentary Film About Race and the Death Penalty
- New Jersey Jail Guards Indicted in Beating Death
- Visiting in Prison (Video)
- A Matter of Fact
- Prisoner Accounts Add Up to Millions
- Alabama Prison Chief Fired over Women in Chains
- Prison: An Entitlement System?
- Segregation Enhancement May Violate Due Process
- Haircut Rule May Violate Equal Protection
- No Immunity for Washington Religious Name Retaliation
- $1.44 Million for Medical Indifference
- Warden Liable for Prison Rape
- Newell Superseded
- New Jersey Governor Vetoes Frivolous Bill
- Minnesota Prisoners Strike for Minimum Wage
- New York Work Release Creates Liberty Interest
- Private Prison Executive Sentenced in Fraud Scheme
- No Right to Wages Under Interstate Compact
- New York Prisoners Entitled to Disciplinary Due Process
- Arizona Held in Contempt over Masters' Fees
- Washington Legislation Passed
- Alaska Prisoner Has Right to Call Witnesses at Hearing
- Attorney Fees Awarded in Death Row Brutality Case
- Retaliatory Transfer and Discipline Unconstitutional
- Mysterious New Syndrome Discovered
- Jail Detainee's Court Access Right Violated
- Failure to Protect States Claim
- Furniture Manufacturers Threatened by UNICOR
- Massachusetts Phone Injunction Affirmed
- Legal Services Funding Cut
- Khalfani Trial Due to Begin
- Bivens Provides Remedy for Work Injury to BOP Prisoners
- Gang War Assault States Claim
- Muslim Can't Be Punished for Refusal to Handle Pork
- Cavity Search in Public States Claim
- News in Brief
- U.S. Supreme Court to Review Cases
More from these topics:
- $1 Million Settlement Reached in Jail Suicide of Maryland Detainee Whose Emergency Hospitalization Order Was Ignored, June 1, 2026. Qualified Immunity, Failure to Protect (Wrongful Death), Suicides, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Deliberate Indifference.
- Sixth Circuit Rules Prisoner Held After Parole Board Ordered Release on Parole Could Not State a Rights Violation Claim, June 1, 2026. Parole, Overdetention, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights.
- Fourth Circuit Revives North Carolina Prisoner’s Suit Blaming Lazy Guards for Assault by Detainee, May 1, 2026. Failure to Protect (General), Qualified Immunity, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Deliberate Indifference.
- Illinois Jail Reprimanded for Denying Detainees Mail Based on Media Content, P.O. Box Return Address, Settles Detainees’ Suit with $111,825 Payment of Legal Fees, May 1, 2026. Publications/Books, Mail Regulations, Censorship, First Amendment, rights, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).
- $2.75 Million Paid by Washington County and NaphCare for Jail Detainee’s Suicide, April 1, 2026. Naphcare, Qualified Immunity, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Suicides, Deliberate Indifference.
- $10.3 Million Paid for Teen’s Death at Kansas Juvenile Detention Facility, April 1, 2026. Restraints, Qualified Immunity, Excessive Force (Wrongful Death), 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Like Prisoners, Most Jail Detainees Now Banned from Receiving Physical Mail, March 1, 2026. Jail Specific, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail, Censorship, Digital Devices, Private Phone Contractors.
- Eighth Circuit Revives Case Against Guards Who Failed to Intervene As Chaplain Sexually Assaulted Arkansas Prisoner, March 1, 2026. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Failure to Protect (General), Prison Rape Elimination Act, Qualified Immunity, Failure to Train/Supervise.
- Mail Went Digital in Alabama Prisons. Families Are Saying Their Mail Isn’t Being Delivered, March 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Legal Mail, First Amendment, rights, Access To Courts, Access to Computers.
- Sixth Circuit Revives Michigan Prisoner’s Challenge to Guard Tackle That Broke His Foot, March 1, 2026. Evidentiary Ruling (Disciplinary Hearings), Guard Brutality/Beatings, Summary Judgment, Qualified Immunity, Wrongful Use of Force.