×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
No Immunity for Washington Religious Name Retaliation
Loaded on July 15, 1996
published in Prison Legal News
July, 1996, page 9
The court of appeals for the ninth circuit held that prisoners have a clearly established right to use legally adopted religious names and prison officials were not entitled to qualified immunity for violating that right. The court also held such prisoners did not have a clearly established right to notary …
Filed under:
Qualified Immunity,
Mail Regulations,
Religious Freedom,
Religious Names.
Location:
Washington.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Prison Litigation Reform Act Passed, by Paul Wright
- Zimmer Amendment Passed
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Double Justice: A Documentary Film About Race and the Death Penalty
- New Jersey Jail Guards Indicted in Beating Death
- Visiting in Prison (Video)
- A Matter of Fact
- Prisoner Accounts Add Up to Millions
- Alabama Prison Chief Fired over Women in Chains
- Prison: An Entitlement System?
- Segregation Enhancement May Violate Due Process
- Haircut Rule May Violate Equal Protection
- No Immunity for Washington Religious Name Retaliation
- $1.44 Million for Medical Indifference
- Warden Liable for Prison Rape
- Newell Superseded
- New Jersey Governor Vetoes Frivolous Bill
- Minnesota Prisoners Strike for Minimum Wage
- New York Work Release Creates Liberty Interest
- Private Prison Executive Sentenced in Fraud Scheme
- No Right to Wages Under Interstate Compact
- New York Prisoners Entitled to Disciplinary Due Process
- Arizona Held in Contempt over Masters' Fees
- Washington Legislation Passed
- Alaska Prisoner Has Right to Call Witnesses at Hearing
- Attorney Fees Awarded in Death Row Brutality Case
- Retaliatory Transfer and Discipline Unconstitutional
- Mysterious New Syndrome Discovered
- Jail Detainee's Court Access Right Violated
- Failure to Protect States Claim
- Furniture Manufacturers Threatened by UNICOR
- Massachusetts Phone Injunction Affirmed
- Legal Services Funding Cut
- Khalfani Trial Due to Begin
- Bivens Provides Remedy for Work Injury to BOP Prisoners
- Gang War Assault States Claim
- Muslim Can't Be Punished for Refusal to Handle Pork
- Cavity Search in Public States Claim
- News in Brief
- U.S. Supreme Court to Review Cases
More from these topics:
- Fourth Circuit Upholds Denial of Qualified Immunity to Jail Supervisors Who Ignored Detainee’s Cranial Abscesses, Oct. 1, 2026. Failure to Treat, Infections, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Deliberate Indifference.
- Sixth Circuit: Qualified Immunity Granted to Guard in Delayed Treatment for Prisoner who Suffered Heart Attack, Oct. 1, 2026. Pain, Cardiovascular, Failure to Treat, Qualified Immunity, Deliberate Indifference.
- Ninth Circuit Rules Favorably for Washington Prisoner Whose Writing Submission Was Censored, Oct. 1, 2026. Retaliation, Qualified Immunity, Mail Regulations, Censorship, First Amendment, rights.
- Eighth Circuit Reverses District Court’s Denial of Motion to Dismiss Some Defendants from Lawsuit Over Missouri Prisoner’s Suicide, Oct. 1, 2026. Qualified Immunity, Sovereign Immunity, Failure to Protect (Wrongful Death), Suicides, Deliberate Indifference.
- Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Qualified Immunity but Clarifies that 14th Amendment ‘Objective Reasonableness’ Is Standard of Review for Pretrial Detainee’s Claim of Sexual Abuse, Oct. 1, 2026. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Pretrial Detention and Detainees, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Eighth Circuit Grants Summary Judgment to Sheriff and County of Nebraska Jail Where Guard Sexually Assaulted Female Prisoner, Oct. 1, 2026. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Failure to Protect (General), Qualified Immunity, Failure to Train/Supervise, Monell Liability.
- Second Circuit Rules Eighth Amendment Governs Claims of Excessive Force Brought by Parole Violator, Oct. 1, 2026. Eighth Amendment, Excessive Force, Qualified Immunity, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- Eight Circuit Reverses Denial of Partial Qualified Immunity in Detainee’s Pepper Ball Claim, Remands Excessive Force Claims, Sept. 1, 2026. Guard Brutality/Beatings, Stun Guns/Tasers, Pepper Spray/Tear Gas, Qualified Immunity, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Fourth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Strip Searches Resulting from Anonymous Tips, Sept. 1, 2026. Strip Searches, Qualified Immunity, Fourth Amendment, rights, Suspicionless Searches.
- Ninth Circuit Revives HRDC Challenge to Washington DOC Mail Restrictions, Aug. 1, 2026. Qualified Immunity, Publications/Books, Due Process, Censorship, First Amendment, rights.

