×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons
Loaded on Oct. 15, 1997
by O'Neil Stough
published in Prison Legal News
October, 1997, page 1
The August 1996, issue of PLN reported Lewis v. Casey, 116 S.Ct. 2174 (1996). The Lewis court, though not explicitly overturning Bounds v. Smith, 430 US 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491 (1977), redefined the meaning of "court access" as it applies to prisoners. The Bounds court held that prison officials are …
Filed under:
Attorney Client,
Law Library Access/Adequacy,
Paralegals,
Photocopies,
Telephones,
Attorney Calls,
Legal Mail.
Location:
Arizona.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons, by O'Neil Stough
- U.S. Sues Prisons in Arizona and Michigan
- A Matter of Fact
- Seventh Circuit Applies ADA to Prisoners
- Three Texas Guards Indicted in Beating Death
- ADA Suits Not Affected by PLRA Attorney Fee Caps, by John Emry
- Editorial, by Dan Pens
- No Qualified Immunity for Denial of Exercise
- Managed Care Infects Prison Health Services
- Fifth Circuit Reverses Scott
- Georgia Prison Guards Speak Out, by Dan Pens
- Senior DOC Officials Implicated
- Felon Disenfranchisement Laws Challenged in Washington
- Prison Conditions in Venezuela
- Get More Georgia Prison Information
- Mississippi Good Time Violates Ex Post Facto
- California Limits Prison Appeals, by Willie Wisely
- Filing Fee Assessed in Dismissed Appeal
- Consent Decree Termination Provision Upheld
- Released Prisoners Must Pay Filing Fees
- PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Habeas
- Released Prisoner Must Pay Filing Fees
- PLRA Physical Harm Requirement Not Retroactive
- PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Released Prisoners
- PLRA Attorney Fee Cap Not Applicable to Pending Cases
- Arizona DOC Contempt Fines Affirmed
- Magistrates Lack Jurisdiction to Impose Contempt Sanctions
- Clemency Letter Ban Questioned
- $5,000 Verdict for Snitch Jacketing Affirmed
- Eleventh Circuit Reinstates Beating Verdict
- Court Allows Silencing of Environmental Whistle-Blower, by Paul Wright
- California Guards Set Up Prisoners, by Willie Wisely
- California, Texas, Arizona Suit Seeking Alien Incarceration Money Fails
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Civil Rights
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Habeas Corpus
- Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Court Access
- CCA Prison Off to a Rocky Start
- A Day at the Human Zoo, by Alice Lynd
- Prison Uprisings Sweep Columbia
- Free to Wardens But Not Convicts?
- Same Sex Harassment of Prisoner Workers Okayed
- LSC Ban on Funding Prison Litigation Enjoined
- Arizona Prisoner Entitled to Kosher Diet
- Sexual Abuse by Guard Nets New York Jail Prisoner $750,000
- Rhode Island Probation Fee Ruling Reversed
- News in Brief
- New York AA Program Violates Establishment Clause
More from O'Neil Stough:
- Former Arizona Governor Sentenced, July 15, 1998
- Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons, Oct. 15, 1997
- Arizona's New Tin Horn Dictator, April 15, 1996
- Oppression on the Rise in Arizona, Aug. 15, 1994
More from these topics:
- Free Phone Calls Saved Prisoners and Their Families More than $600 Million, Report Finds, July 1, 2026. Conditions of Confinement, PLRA, Prisoner Privileges, Rehabilitation/Recidivism, Telephones.
- ICE Settles Suit Over Opening Detainees’ Legal Mail, April 1, 2026. Legal Mail, Attorney Visits, First Amendment, rights, Immigration Detention, Attorney/Client.
- Like Prisoners, Most Jail Detainees Now Banned from Receiving Physical Mail, March 1, 2026. Jail Specific, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail, Censorship, Digital Devices, Private Phone Contractors.
- Mail Went Digital in Alabama Prisons. Families Are Saying Their Mail Isn’t Being Delivered, March 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Legal Mail, First Amendment, rights, Access To Courts, Access to Computers.
- Most U.S. Prisoners Now Barred from Directly Receiving Physical Mail, Feb. 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail, Censorship, Warrantless Searches, Electronic Surveillance.
- United States Postal Service Declares Postmarks Could Be Delayed, Feb. 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail, Access To Courts.
- Ninth Circuit Grants Equitable Tolling Under AEDPA Where Attorney Abandoned Prisoner by Failing to Communicate for Nine Months and Prison Officials Delayed Processing Filing Documents, Dec. 15, 2025. Attorney Misconduct, Legal Materials, Law Library Access/Adequacy, Limitations, AEDPA.
- New Hampshire Guard Abuse and Theft Uncovered Through Poaching Investigation, Dec. 1, 2025. Guard Misconduct, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Legal Mail, Obstruction of Justice.
- Federal Injunction Bars ICE from Crowding Detainees in Unsanitary “Hold” Rooms in New York City Office, Nov. 1, 2025. Diabetes, Failure to Treat, Totality of Conditions, Food, Overcrowding, Plumbing, Sanitation, Bedding, Hygiene Supplies, Prisoner Legal Assistance, Legal Materials, Law Library Access/Adequacy, Summary Judgment, Injunctions, Class Certification, Immigration Detention.
- Ohio Sued by Non-Profit Law Firm for Opening Prisoner Legal Mail, July 15, 2025. Attorney Client, Legal Materials, Attorney Calls, Legal Mail.

