Skip navigation
Prison Legal News
× You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.

PLRA Physical Harm Requirement Not Retroactive

Loaded on Oct. 15, 1997 published in Prison Legal News October, 1997, page 14
Filed under: Retaliation, Snitch Jacketing, Whistleblowing, Physical Injury Rule, Informants (Failure to Protect). Location: Indiana.
A federal district court in Indiana held that 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e), which precludes suits by prisoners seeking money damages in the absence of physical harm, does not apply retroactively to suits filed before the PLRA's enactment. The court also held a prisoner states a claim for violation of his ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Experiment in Access: Law Libraries Eliminated in Arizona Prisons, by O'Neil Stough
  2. U.S. Sues Prisons in Arizona and Michigan
  3. A Matter of Fact
  4. Seventh Circuit Applies ADA to Prisoners
  5. Three Texas Guards Indicted in Beating Death
  6. ADA Suits Not Affected by PLRA Attorney Fee Caps, by John Emry
  7. Editorial, by Dan Pens
  8. No Qualified Immunity for Denial of Exercise
  9. Managed Care Infects Prison Health Services
  10. Fifth Circuit Reverses Scott
  11. Georgia Prison Guards Speak Out, by Dan Pens
  12. Senior DOC Officials Implicated
  13. Felon Disenfranchisement Laws Challenged in Washington
  14. Prison Conditions in Venezuela
  15. Get More Georgia Prison Information
  16. Mississippi Good Time Violates Ex Post Facto
  17. California Limits Prison Appeals, by Willie Wisely
  18. Filing Fee Assessed in Dismissed Appeal
  19. Consent Decree Termination Provision Upheld
  20. Released Prisoners Must Pay Filing Fees
  21. PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Habeas
  22. Released Prisoner Must Pay Filing Fees
  23. PLRA Physical Harm Requirement Not Retroactive
  24. PLRA Fees Don't Apply to Released Prisoners
  25. PLRA Attorney Fee Cap Not Applicable to Pending Cases
  26. Arizona DOC Contempt Fines Affirmed
  27. Magistrates Lack Jurisdiction to Impose Contempt Sanctions
  28. Clemency Letter Ban Questioned
  29. $5,000 Verdict for Snitch Jacketing Affirmed
  30. Eleventh Circuit Reinstates Beating Verdict
  31. Court Allows Silencing of Environmental Whistle-Blower, by Paul Wright
  32. California Guards Set Up Prisoners, by Willie Wisely
  33. California, Texas, Arizona Suit Seeking Alien Incarceration Money Fails
  34. Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Civil Rights
  35. Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Habeas Corpus
  36. Recent US Supreme Court Rulings of Interest: Court Access
  37. CCA Prison Off to a Rocky Start
  38. A Day at the Human Zoo, by Alice Lynd
  39. Prison Uprisings Sweep Columbia
  40. Free to Wardens But Not Convicts?
  41. Same Sex Harassment of Prisoner Workers Okayed
  42. LSC Ban on Funding Prison Litigation Enjoined
  43. Arizona Prisoner Entitled to Kosher Diet
  44. Sexual Abuse by Guard Nets New York Jail Prisoner $750,000
  45. Rhode Island Probation Fee Ruling Reversed
  46. News in Brief
  47. New York AA Program Violates Establishment Clause

More from these topics: