×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Heck Applied to Segregation Claims
Loaded on April 15, 1998
published in Prison Legal News
April, 1998, page 18
The court of appeals for the seventh circuit held that a prisoner's claim that his due process rights were violated at a prison disciplinary hearing was not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and had to be brought as a habeas corpus challenge, even though no good time credits were ...
Filed under:
Disciplinary Hearings,
Disciplinary Litigation,
Liberty Interests,
Evidentiary Ruling (Disciplinary Hearings),
Standard of Proof,
Habeas Corpus.
Location:
Indiana.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Rural Prison as Colonial Master, by Christian Parenti
- French Robertson Prisoner Wins Suit
- Texas Warden Not Victim of Staff Assault, by T.Q.
- In Memory - Reverends Ernest Bromley and Maurice McCrackin, by John Perotti
- Mystery of Guard's Death Unlocked, by B K
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- Weights Banned in California, by Willie Wisely
- The Limits of the Law, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- Third Circuit Applies ADA to Prisoners; Supreme Court Grants Review
- Even Nominal Damages May Justify Attorney Fee Award
- $9,500 Award for Involuntary Psychotropic Drugging Affirmed
- MA and WA Parole Suits Not Cognizable Under § 1983
- Folsom New Year's Riot Over Haircut Policy
- Community Notification Upheld by Three Circuits
- $1.1 Million Award in Sexual Assault
- Failure to Protect Informant Claim Set for Trial
- $225,000 Jury Award in CDC Shooting Affirmed
- BOP Sentence Reductions Cannot Be Denied Based Upon Firearm Enhancements
- BJS Reports Prison Litigation Statistics
- PLRA Termination Provisions Constitutional
- Prolonged SHU Confinement May Implicate Liberty Interest But No Damages
- BOP Exceeds Statutory Authority in Denying Sentence Reduction
- News in Brief
- Pretrial Detainees Not Covered by FLSA
- Damage Award and Attorney Fees in Censorship Suit Affirmed
- U.S. Liable for Loss of Prisoner's Property
- 4th Circuit Establishes Detainee Excessive Force Standard
- PA DOC Not 'Victim' for Restitution Purposes
- Heck Applied to Segregation Claims
- No Immunity for Hearing Officer's Failure to Examine CI Credibility
- No Immunity in Jail Suicide for Medical Contractor
- $450,000 Award in Sexual Assault Case Not Excessive
- 5th Cir. Holds IFP Dismissals Are With Prejudice
- No Immunity for Smoke Exposure
- Florida Prisoners Have Property Interest Under DOC Rules
- Refusal to Waive Interest States Claim
- Alaska Computer Printer Ban Questioned
- Conditions in Camden County Jail Unconstitutional
More from these topics:
- New York Prison Officials Found Routinely Violating HALT Act With Overuse of Solitary Confinement, Feb. 15, 2025. Disciplinary Hearings, Control Units/SHU/Solitary Confinement, Cruel and Unusual Punishment.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, Feb. 1, 2025. junk science, Habeas Corpus, Forensic Sciences, Child Abuse/Abusers, Evidence - Admissibility.
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025. Settlements, Habeas Corpus, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail.
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Relief Where Both Trial and Appellate Counsel Provided Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Challenge Indictment for Residential Burglary That Failed to Allege Defendant Illegally Entered a ‘Dwelling’, Jan. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Constitutional Challenges/Law.
- Ninth Circuit Holds District Courts Have No Authority Under Rule 4 of Rules Governing § 2254 Cases to Dismiss Habeas Petition on the Merits, Dec. 15, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Dismissal, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- Washington Appellate Court: “Some Evidence” Standard for Prison Discipline “Is Not Illusory”, Dec. 15, 2024. Evidentiary Ruling (Disciplinary Hearings), Evidence, Best Evidence Rule.
- Ninth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to California Prisoner on Napue Claim Because Prosecution Failed to Correct Informant’s False Testimony That He Did Not Receive Any Benefit In Exchange for His Testimony, Dec. 1, 2024. Informants, Habeas Corpus, Informants and Paid Witnesses, False Testimony.
- Public Defender Files Habeas Petitions for Detainees at “Horrific” Baltimore Lockup, Nov. 15, 2024. Failure to Treat, Conditions of Confinement, Hygiene Supplies, Disclosure of Records, Habeas Corpus.
- Ninth Circuit Denies Habeas Relief to Prisoner Who Invoked Fifth Amendment Right to Counsel During Custodial Interrogation but Made Incriminating Statements to Undercover Informant Posing as Fellow Prisoner Because Right to Counsel Not Violated, Nov. 1, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Counsel - Right to.