× You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.
Strip Searched Massachusetts Women Settle Suit for $80,000
To avoid a hearing on the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction the MA DOC entered into a stipulation on November 21, 1995, where it agreed that prison guards would not wear ski masks or other articles to conceal their identities, other than protective gear such as visors or helmets. The DOC agreed that when searching rooms, cells or prisoners at MCI Framingham guards would refrain from deliberate actions intended to inflict severe emotional distress on the prisoners being searched. Absent reasonable suspicion that a prisoner had ingested drugs, no urine tests would be conducted at MCI Framingham between 11 PM and 7 AM. The DOC agreed to provide timely medical attention to prisoners who requested it during searches. The DOC agreed to conduct strip searches and urine tests at the prison "in relative privacy with as much dignity as possible and will not be conducted in the presence of members of the opposite gender or in the presence of staff other than those directly performing the search, except in an emergency." The DOC also agreed that guards performing searches "will not unnecessarily destroy or disrupt inmates' personal or state issued property."
In settling the suit, the MA DOC denied any wrongdoing or liability but agreed to pay the plaintiffs $80,000 in damages, plus attorney fees. The sixteen strip searched prisoners would receive an average damage award of $1,665; the remaining 96 prisoners would receive $555. The settlement leaves the distribution of the damage award to the plaintiffs but specified that no single plaintiff could receive more than $5,000. The stipulation entered into in 1995 is to remain in effect permanently and can be enforced in a separate action by any prisoner imprisoned at MCI Framingham. Readers should note this is an unpublished settlement. Attorney fees have not yet been awarded. The plaintiffs were capably represented by MCLS attorneys Barry Barkow and Lisa Otero. See: Aquino v. DuBois , Suffolk County Superior Court No. 95-6175.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
Related legal case
Aquino v. DuBois
|Cite||Suffolk County Superior Court No. 95-6175|
|Level||State Trial Court|