Skip navigation
Prison Legal News
× You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.

Construction Contractor Not Liable Under §1983 for Disabling Fire Safety Equipment

Loaded on Jan. 15, 2001 published in Prison Legal News January, 2001, page 13
Filed under: Fire Hazards, Shelter, Civil Procedure, Complaints, Parties, Limitations, Discovery, Contractor Liability. Location: Illinois.
Construction Contractor Not Liable Under §1983 for Disabling Fire Safety Equipment

A federal district court in Illinois has dismissed a private construction contractor from a suit alleging a prisoner was injured in a fire after the contractor's employees removed and disabled fire safety and prevention equipment in the prison. The …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Hepatitis C, A 'Silent Epidemic' Strikes U.S. Prisons, by Silja JA Talvi
  2. Louisiana Prison System Exceeds Administrative Statutory Authority
  3. U.S. S.Ct. Upholds PLRA Automatic Termination Law
  4. Florida X-Wing Guard Acquitted in Valdes Beating
  5. Wisconsin Supermax Bans Local Paper
  6. Qualified Immunity Denied in CO Rape Case; Suit Settled for $70,000
  7. From the Editor, by Paul Wright
  8. Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Illinois Sheriff Denied
  9. Alabama Ad Seg Publication Ban Struck Down
  10. Morrissey Protections Required for WA Community Custody Revocation
  11. AZ Medical Copayment Not Retroactive, by James Quigley
  12. Iowa Segregation Suit Settled, by James Quigley
  13. Right to Associate Still Viable
  14. Construction Contractor Not Liable Under §1983 for Disabling Fire Safety Equipment
  15. Guard Reinstated After Nazi Flag Flap, by Ronald Young
  16. Habeas Hints: State Remedies, by Kent A. Russell
  17. DC Prisoners Sue VA Over Restraints
  18. Build Jails, Not Schools: Ohio Prison Building Corruption, by Bill Dunne
  19. Administrative Exhaustion Required in Third Circuit; U.S. S. Ct. Grants Review
  20. Sodexho Bows to Pressure, Announces Sale of CCA Stock
  21. University Cancels Sodhexo-Marriott Contract
  22. States of Confinement: Policing, Detention, and Prisons, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
  23. PLRA Attorney's Fees Cap Applies to Nonprisoner Intervenors
  24. Pubic Hair Search of Released Jail Detainee Unconstitutional
  25. IFP Litigant Entitled to Amend Complaint
  26. MO Consent Decree Modification Affirmed
  27. News in Brief
  28. NY DOCS Guard Nets $300,000 for ADA Retaliation
  29. Certificate of Review Mandatory in Colorado Negligence Suits, by Bob Williams
  30. DC District Court Denies Guards' Summary Judgment Retaliation Case
  31. High Standard of Proof for Retaliation Claims
  32. No Immunity for Ignoring Prisoner Work Restrictions, by Ronald Young
  33. Cursory Medical Treatment Cruel and Unusual
  34. NY Prisoners Have Liberty Interest in Work Release, by Ronald Young
  35. Seventh Circuit Rejects ETS Claim

More from these topics: