Skip navigation

Search

22505 results
Page 622 of 1126. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 ... 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 | Next »

Case • 2002
. Jon E. LITSCHER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-3442. Argued Jan. 18, 2002. Decided Sept. 6, 2002. *766 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 99 ...
Case • 2003
28 U.S.C. § § 1915(e)(2) and 1915A; 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c). In his timely appeal, Taylor reasserts his claim and moves for miscellaneous relief. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the district court ...
Case • 2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [18] *fn1 . 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 411-12 (2000). [19] *fn2 . Id. at 409, 412. [20] *fn3 . 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1). [21] *fn4 . Matthew v. Johnson ...
Case • 1980
in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. [11] In the district court Harrell claimed that he had been ...
Case • 1983
Non-Argument Calendar [3] 697 F.2d 992, 1983 [4] February 10, 1983 [5] ARTHUR L. WANNINGER, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CAPT. D. E. DAVENPORT, ET AL., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE ...
Case • 2004
ascertain the intent of the Legislature so as to effectuate the purpose of the law. [W]e begin with the words of a statute and give these words their ordinary meaning. If the statutory language is clear ...
Case • 2002
Hall v. johnson - 224 F.Supp.2d 1058 (E. D. Va. 2002). - 2002 HALL v. JOHNSON, 224 F.Supp.2d 1058 (E.D.Va. 09/30/2002) [1] United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk ...
Case • 2004
) Class C felony when the crime attempted is a class B felony; '(d) Gross misdemeanor when the crime attempted is a class C felony; '(e) Misdemeanor when the crime attempted is a gross misdemeanor ...
Case • 2003
, 150 (2d Cir. 1997) ("[E]ven an erroneous evidentiary ruling will not lead to reversal unless affirmance would be 'inconsistent with substantial justice.'" (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 61)). [18] I ...
Case • 2003
; WILLIAM B. ELLIOTT, judge. [12] Paula D. Hofaker, of Logan, for appellant. [13] Robert E. Wasinger, of the Kansas Department of Corrections, for appellee. [14] Before Rulon, C.J., Knudson, J ...
Case • 1988
there is a genuine issue of material fact as to how Williams' elbow was broken, summary judgment was inappropriate. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); see also Perry v. Thompson, 786 F.2d 1093 (11th Cir.1986) (where prisoner ...
Case • 1986
] 786 F.2d 1093, 1986 [4] April 15, 1986 [5] DONALD PERRY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. R. E. THOMPSON, SGT., ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES [6] Appeal from the United States District ...
Case • 2002
.3d 437, 2002 [4] April 01, 2002 [5] JAMES CARL HIGGS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM E. CARVER AND JAMES M. WOLFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. [6] Appeal from the United States ...
Case • 2002
and declaratory relief for such violations. The district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and as frivolous. See 28 U. S. C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). We ...
Case • 2002
, 1355-56, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). Rather, he "must come forward with `specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.'" Id. at 587, 106 S.Ct. at 1356 (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e)). "Where ...
Case • 2001
-2271 [4] November 13, 2001 [5] REGINALD R. EARLY, APPELLANT, v. JOHN LOWE, ASSISTANT WARDEN, EAST ARKANSAS REGIONAL UNIT, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION (ORIGINALLY SUED AS J E LOWE); STAN ...
Case • 2002
-Appellee: Janet L. Parsanko, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Indianapolis, IN USA. JUDGES: Before Hon. THOMAS E. FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge, Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge, Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS ...
Case • 1988
, CHARLES J. SCULLY, SUPERINTENDENT, GREEN HAVEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CAPT. RONALD E. MILES, GREEN HAVEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, LT. CHARLES GREINER, RONALD LEIGHT, RICHARD W. PROUTY, FRANK ARIZMENDI, HAROLD ...
Case • 1990
, for the defendants-appellees. [9] Carl Dean Swift, Pro Se, Douglas, Arizona, for the plaintiff-appellant. [10] Mariannina E. Preston, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendants ...
Case • 2005
is not accepted, it is returned to the inmate with instructions to resubmit the grievance through the normal three-step process. Id. § 33-103.006(4); § 33-103.007(6)(e). The incidents on which Green based his ...
Page 622 of 1126. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 ... 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 | Next »