Skip navigation

Search

18598 results
Page 67 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »

Case • 2000
. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit [2] No. 99-2674 [3] 199 F.3d 374, 10 A.D. Cases 106, 2000 [4] January 04, 2000 [5] RICHARD CASSIDY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. INDIANA ...
Case • 2002
"), proceeding pro se, has brought this action pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a)(2), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 ...
Case • 2003
. OPINION BY: ALLEN SHARP OPINION: [*970] MEMORANDUM AND ORDER William Craft, a prisoner currently confined in the Wabash Valley Correctional [*971] Facility, submitted a complaint under 42 U.S.C ...
Case • 2008
individual and official capacities, Appellees. No. 07-2704 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT 523 F.3d 841 March 10, 2008, Submitted May 2, 2008, Filed [*842] BOWMAN, Circuit Judge ...
Brief
VDOC for Violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 et seq.) 11. The plaintiff is a qualified individual with a disability as defined in the §§12131(2) of the ADA ...
Filing • May 31, 2013
Filed under: Complaints
be produced to the plaintiff. Jurisdiction and Venue 1. This Court has jurisdiction to hear public records enforcement actions in accordance with Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 1, § 319(a). 2. This Court has personal ...
Brief • July 17, 1998
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION BRG OF DICKENS COUNTY, INC., •....-. ¿ ; ¡ (¦Q\jRt NOMHtRf*tlSIi»¡CTOFTE3US FILED ) ) ) Plaintiff, v, P.2 09:42Rm USAO I_UBBOCK T ...
Brief • July 1, 2008
Mcconaha v City of Reynoldsburg Oh Attorney Fees Order Police Excessive Force 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JEREMY C. McCONAHA, Plaintiff, Case No. 2 ...
is brought, in part, pursuant to 42 USC §1983 for deprivation of plaintiff’s constitutional civil rights; jurisdiction is therefore appropriate under 28 USC §§1331 and 1343. The claims asserted herein arose ...
of 1871 (42 U.S.C. Section 1983). This court has jurisdiction under and by virtue of28 U.S.C. Sections 1343, 1331 and 1367. 2. Venue is founded in this judicial court upon 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 ...
Brief • May 24, 2021
or argument to the jury that Bauman and Gaddis are not liable because they did not act with “subjective criminal recklessness” and/or with “criminal” intent; and (2) offering evidence or argument concerning ...
Brief • August 20, 2013
- a6a9 0- Plaintiff, CONIPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FORe 1. Violation of Civil Rights o v. (42 U.S.C. S1983, 1985(3),1986); 2. Monell Cfaim 11 LEROY BACCA, individually, (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983); jointly, severally ...
Publication • 2014
California receives the minimum plus an award based on its share of total violent crime and population. Step 2: De minimus awards [Legislative mandate: 42 USC § 3755 (a)(2)] The JAG legislation requires ...
Case • 2005
filing his civil cause of action as required by W. Va. Code § 25-1A-2(a) (2000) (Repl. Vol. 2004) and that he had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted in accordance with 42 U.S.C ...
Brief • March 2, 2020
Gartman v. Cheatham, AL, Complaint, Medical Neglect, 2020 Case 2:18-cv-00534-MHT-JTA Document 101 Filed 03/02/20 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA ...
Case • 1997
as someone who with or without a reasonable accommodation has the physical and mental capacity to participate in the program or activity in question, 42 U.S.C. sec. 12131(2); and in the present posture ...
Case • 1997
) The free exercise clause of the First Amendment, through 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (2) RFRA, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb; (3) The American Indian Religious Freedom Act ("AIRFA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1996; and (4) The Indian ...
Brief • 2007
and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc (2000). 2. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Defendants have, without due process of law, imposed conditions upon Plaintiff Meza’s incarceration ...
Brief • April 26, 2023
Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. NATURE OF THE CASE 1. This is an action brought by Plaintiff seeking damages from Defendant for acts of discrimination. Defendant’s ...
of the law. Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff requests a trial by jury. Case: 1:12-cv-05151 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/12 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:2 JURISIDICTION AND VENUE ...
Page 67 of 930. « Previous | 1 2 3 4 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 926 927 928 929 930 | Next »