Skip navigation

Search

19 results
Article • November 18, 2015
Nebraska: Evidence and Due Process Sufficient to Find Prisoner Guilty of Prison Rule Infraction by Nebraska: Evidence and Due Process Sufficient to Find Prisoner Guilty of Prison Rule Infraction The Nebraska Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court’s holding that prisoner James Saylor received due process and was found …
Article • January 10, 2015 • from PLN January, 2015
Admission of Jail Disciplinary Records at Criminal Trial May Violate Confrontation Clause by David Reutter Admission of Jail Disciplinary Records at Criminal Trial May Violate Confrontation Clause by David M. Reutter The Texas Court of Appeals, First District, held in December 2013 that the admission of jail disciplinary records at …
Third Circuit: Prison Disciplinary Hearing Officer Must Examine Potentially Exculpatory Evidence by The Third Circuit held, twice in the same case, that it is a due process violation for a prison hearing officer not to examine documentary evidence that a prisoner charged with a disciplinary infraction believes will exonerate him, …
Failure to Record Disciplinary Hearing, Allow Adverse Witnesses in Alaskan Prison Disciplinary Hearing Violates Due Process by Matthew Clarke by Matt Clarke On September 2, 2011, the Supreme Court of Alaska held that due process was violated when prison officials failed to record a prisoner's disciplinary hearing or allow him …
California U.S. District Court Holds that Prop. 9 Does Not Supersede Previously-Issued Injunction Regarding Parole Revocation Procedures by John Dannenberg by John E. Dannenberg Senior U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence K. Karlton has upheld a 2004 injunction that conflicts with the parole revocation provisions of California’s so-called Victims’ Bill of …
9th Circuit Rejects Prisoner Self-Defense Theory in Assault with Shank by Derek Gilna By Derek Gilna The U.S. Appeals Court for the 9th Circuit has declined to permit prisoner Lenny Urena from asserting "self-defense" in his trial for assault with a dangerous weapon against a fellow prisoner. The Court also …
Article • February 15, 2012
Seventh Circuit: Crawford Not Applicable to Revocation Hearings by On May 2, 2006, the Seventh Circuit held that the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses as set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 561 U.S. 36 (2004), does not apply to revocation hearings. Lamond D. Kelley, a federal …
No Qualified Immunity for Inadequate Iowa Disciplinary Notice by The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s denial of qualified immunity to prison officials on an Iowa prisoner’s inadequate disciplinary notice claim. Iowa prisoner William Dible was granted work release in April 2003, and placed at a residential …
Article • October 15, 2009 • from PLN October, 2009
“Habeas Hints” by Kent A. Russell by Kent Russell This column provides “habeas hints” to prisoners who are considering or handling habeas corpus petitions as their own attorneys (“in pro per”). The focus of the column is on habeas corpus under AEDPA, the 1996 habeas corpus law which now governs …
Supreme Court Addresses Mail, Good-Time, Legal Aid, Disciplinary Issues by The U.S. Supreme Court held that restoration of good-time was unavailable under § 1983; some constitutional rights are retained in prison disciplinary proceedings; minimal due process is required if loss of good-time is a possibility; disciplinary due process procedures ordered …
Article • May 15, 2004 • from PLN May, 2004
New Jersey Prisoners May Confront Accusers in Disciplinary Hearings by Michael Rigby In response to a ruling by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, the New Jersey Department of Corrections has announced that they will afford prisoners the opportunity to question their accusers in person during disciplinary hearings, …
Due Process Violation, Plain Error Reverse Marijuana Conviction by The Michigan Supreme Court reversed a state prisoner's conviction for possession of marijuana after finding that the prosecution had improperly introduced inculpatory statements made by the defendant at an earlier prison disciplinary hearing. Raymond Wyngaard was a prisoner of Michigan's Kinross …
Article • March 15, 2001 • from PLN March, 2001
NJ Prisoners Entitled to Cross Examine Witnesses by Holding that a prisoner was entitled to cross examine and to confront the complaining witness at a prison disciplinary hearing, a New Jersey appellate court reversed the sanctions imposed on a prisoner accused of tampering with a locking device on a gate. …
Edwards v. Balisok: A Partial Victory for Prisoners by David C Fathi by David C. Fathi On May 19, 1997, the United States Supreme Court decided Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 117 S.Ct. 1584 (1997). Although the Court reversed a favorable decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the …
Alaska Prisoner Has Right to Call Witnesses at Hearing by The Alaska supreme court held that refusing to allow a prisoner to call witnesses and to question the accusing staff member at a prison disciplinary hearing violated the prisoner's due process rights. Mattfi Abruska is an Alaska state prisoner. He …
Fabricated Charges State Claim by The court of appeals for the second circuit has held that a prisoner alleging guards had planted contraband in his cell in retaliation for prior lawsuits had presented sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. The court also held that the federal § 1983 suit wasn't …
Prisoners Allowed to See Evidence Against Them by Prisoners Allowed To See Evidence Against Them A federal prisoner in Pennsylvania was infracted and charged with making threats of bodily harm to another prisoner and refusing a cell assignment. The threats were supposedly made in a letter Young, the prisoner, gave …