×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Partial Filing Fee Allowed
Loaded on Feb. 15, 1996
published in Prison Legal News
February, 1996, page 19
The ninth circuit explicitly reaffirmed prior rulings which permit the district courts to collect a partial filing fee from prisoner litigants. Two California state prisoners sought to file § 1983 lawsuits in federal court. Both requested permission to proceed in forma pauperis, without paying the filing fees. The district court ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- How the Florida DOC Circumvents Prisoners' Rights to Meaningful Access to the Courts, by Van Poyck, William
- Jury Awards $39,000 in Texas Scalding
- From the Editor, by Dan Pens
- RFRA Case Set for Trial
- Washington DOC Costs Policy Enjoined
- Ohio Update, by John Perotti
- Unrest in NY Prisons, by EO E
- Suspect Peppers in LA, by Clay Huff
- An Angry White Man, by C L
- U.S.P. Lewisburg Lockdown
- Washington Court Access Suit Settled, by Paul Wright
- New Jersey Takes Computers
- Jurors Challenge Tennessee Constitution
- Alaska Overcrowding Fines Increase
- Attorney Fee Award Affirmed
- ISRB Can't Change Rules to Avoid Compliance with Court Order
- Washington Prisoners Have Liberty Interest in Good Time
- No Jurisdiction for Some Appeals
- Kidnapping and Extortion, Texas Style, by Dan Pens
- Irish POWs in the US
- Peru Political Materials
- It's About Time: Americas Imprisonment Binge, by Linda Wilson
- Weight Lifting Info Available on the Internet
- No Immunity for Retaliatory Discipline
- Fifth Circuit to Require Administrative Exhaustion
- Georgia Prisoner Strangled by Guards
- Colorado Prisoners Riot in Texas Jail
- $7,639.20 Awarded in Retaliatory Transfer
- No Immunity for AIDS RA Claim
- Partial Filing Fee Allowed
- BOP Multiple Cell May Violate Constitution
- Failure to Provide Medical Treatment Unlawful
- Court Access in Massachusetts DDU Challenged
- CDC Hobby Shop Ruling Affirmed
- NC Prisoners Riot in Tennessee
- Fabricated Charges State Claim
- Ninth Circuit Rejects Disciplinary Double Jeopardy
- Sandin Applied Retroactively
More from these topics:
- Fourth Circuit Chides Virginia Magistrate for Assuming Prisoners Proceed IFP, Aug. 15, 2024. Filing Fees, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, In Forma Pauperis.
- Nevada Federal Court Says Prisoner’s § 1983 Suit Should’ve Been a Habeas Petition, But Returns Filing Fee, Feb. 1, 2023. Filing Fees, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Amendments to Petition.
- Dismissal Not Authorized for Oregon Victim’s Refusal to Comply With Subpoena, Oct. 4, 2020. Civil Procedure, Subpoenas, Fair Trial.
- Missouri County Votes to Eliminate Jail Fees, Wiping Out $3.4 Million in Debt for Former Prisoners, Jan. 9, 2020. Filing Fees, Bond Fees, Booking Fees.
- Ohio Mayor’s Courts Are Huge Sources of Unjust Revenues, June 17, 2019. Misconduct/Corruption, Prosecutor/Attorney General Misconduct, Filing Fees, Bond Fees, Booking Fees.
- Colorado: $190,000 Settlement for Prisoners Ordered Released but Kept in Jail for Inability to Pay $55 Fee, April 2, 2019. Settlements, Filing Fees, Booking Fees.
- In Landmark Civil Asset Forfeiture Case, U.S. Supreme Court Holds Excessive Fines Clause of Eighth Amendment Applicable to States, March 15, 2019. Filing Fees, Forfeiture, Bond Fees, Booking Fees.
- First Circuit Announces No Joint Participation Exception to Spousal Testimonial Privilege, Feb. 14, 2019. Civil Procedure, Marriage.
- California Court of Appeal: Using Criminal Process to Collect Fines That Indigent Defendants Cannot Pay Is Unconstitutional, Feb. 14, 2019. Filing Fees, Bond Fees, Booking Fees, Constitution, U.S..
- Fee to Plead Guilty Burdens Indigent Defendants in Pennsylvania, Dec. 30, 2018. Guilty Pleas, Filing Fees, Money/Property.