×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Illegal Detention Violates Substantive Due Process
Loaded on April 15, 1999
published in Prison Legal News
April, 1999, page 15
The court of appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the detention of an individual for 57 days in a county jail on a civil contempt warrant "shocks the conscience" and violates substantive due process. The court further held that this right was clearly established, and the defendants were not …
Filed under:
Civil Procedure,
State Law Claims,
Wrongful Imprisonment,
Qualified Immunity,
Supervisory Liability,
Municipal Liability.
Location:
Indiana.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- The Mental Torture of American Prisoners: Cheaper Than Lab Rats, Part 2, by Hans Sherrer
- Medical Care Unconstitutional in Puerto Rico Prisons
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- PLN Sues Michigan DOC over Censorship of The Celling of America
- Michigan Department of Corrections Fined $300,000 in Contempt Case
- Former Jail Prisoner Awarded $8,000 for Abuse; PLRA Attorney Fee Limit Inapplicable to Juveniles
- Jailhouse Journalism: The Fourth Estate Behind Bars by James McGrath (Book Review), by Paul Wright
- Losing the Vote: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States (Book Review), by Alex Friedmann
- PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Not Retroactive
- PLRA Fee Provisions Apply to All Pending Cases in the Fifth Circuit
- Eighth Circuit Upholds, Defines IFP Provisions
- IFP Application Not Required When Suit Filed
- Physical Injury Requirement Not Retroactive
- No Leave to Amend Complaint for IFP Litigants
- PLRA Doesn't Ban Class Actions
- Trouble in Mind: ADX – The Fourth Year, by Ray Luc Levasseur
- Daring Death Row Escape Shakes up Texas
- Oregon "Predatory Sex Offender" Label Requires Notice and Hearing
- De Facto Ban on Live Testimony Unconstitutional
- South Carolina Parole Elimination Violates Ex Post Facto
- Illegal Detention Violates Substantive Due Process
- Jury Awards $8,000 in California Prison Assault
- New York Prisoners Have Right to Staff Assistance and Witness Testimony
- Seventh Circuit Defines Court Access Claims Involving Property
- Failure to Give Summary Judgement Notice is Reversible Error
- Indiana May Not Deny Pay and Educational Programs to Protective Custody Prisoners
- No Appeal Allowed in Louisiana Consent Decree Dissolution
- U.S. District Courts Have No Authority To Grant Or Deny Credit Toward Sentence
- Denial of Good Time Because of Jury Sentencing Choice Violates Equal Protection
- $45,000 Award in BOP Tort Claim Medical Neglect Suit
- Released Sex Offender Not "In Custody" for Habeas
- New York Jail Brutality Suit Settled for $3,500
- Timothy "Little Rock" Reed Released on Parole
- $1,500 in Disabled Prisoner Work Suit
- $355,000 Verdict in New York Asthma Death
- Mauro Vacated for Rehearing
- Parole Change May Violate Ex Post Facto; Change Can Be Challenged Via § 1983
- BOP Violent Offender Notification Policy Overinclusive
- Twenty-Four Hour Notice of Disciplinary Charges Required
- Seizure of Trust Account Interest Violates Takings Clause
- Denial of Handicapped Jail Facilities Set for Trial
- News in Brief
- Cane Seizure Can Violate Eighth Amendment
- $250,000 FTCA Beating Judgment Reversed
More from these topics:
- Exonerated Texas Prisoner Entitled to $1.68 Million After 22 Years of Wrongful Incarceration, May 1, 2026. Wrongful Conviction, Wrongful Imprisonment, Actual Innocence/Claim of Innocence, Failure to Consult/Investigate/Raise, Expert and Opinion Testimony.
- Fourth Circuit Revives North Carolina Prisoner’s Suit Blaming Lazy Guards for Assault by Detainee, May 1, 2026. Failure to Protect (General), Qualified Immunity, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Deliberate Indifference.
- $2.75 Million Paid by Washington County and NaphCare for Jail Detainee’s Suicide, April 1, 2026. Naphcare, Qualified Immunity, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Suicides, Deliberate Indifference.
- $10.3 Million Paid for Teen’s Death at Kansas Juvenile Detention Facility, April 1, 2026. Restraints, Qualified Immunity, Excessive Force (Wrongful Death), 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Eighth Circuit Revives Case Against Guards Who Failed to Intervene As Chaplain Sexually Assaulted Arkansas Prisoner, March 1, 2026. Staff-Prisoner Assault, Failure to Protect (General), Prison Rape Elimination Act, Qualified Immunity, Failure to Train/Supervise.
- Sixth Circuit Revives Michigan Prisoner’s Challenge to Guard Tackle That Broke His Foot, March 1, 2026. Evidentiary Ruling (Disciplinary Hearings), Guard Brutality/Beatings, Summary Judgment, Qualified Immunity, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Louisiana Prisoner Sustains Claim Against Prison Doctor for Allowing Assignment to “Field Duty” Despite Known Ankle Injury, March 1, 2026. Inability to Work, Skeletal Injury, Summary Judgment, Qualified Immunity, Deliberate Indifference.
- Tenth Circuit Affirmed Denial of Guards Qualified Immunity in Disabled Detainee’s Fourteenth Amendment Claim, March 1, 2026. Failure to Treat, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights, Deliberate Indifference.
- Michigan Claws Back $1.2 Million Paid to Wrongfully Convicted Former Prisoner, Feb. 1, 2026. Police Misconduct, Wrongful Imprisonment, Qualified Immunity, Forensic Sciences, Fabrication of Evidence.
- Ninth Circuit: Notice of Appeal of Order Denying Qualified Immunity Must Be Filed Within 30 Days of Entry, Feb. 1, 2026. Liberty Interests, Evidence, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights.

