×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Oregon "Predatory Sex Offender" Label Requires Notice and Hearing
Loaded on April 15, 1999
published in Prison Legal News
April, 1999, page 14
Oregon "Predatory Sex Offender" Label Requires Notice and Hearing
Filed under:
Discrimination,
Sex Offenders (Discrimination),
Disclosure of Records,
Parole.
Location:
Oregon.
The Oregon Supreme Court ruled that due process requires that Oregon sex offenders receive notice and an evidentiary hearing before the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) may designate them as "predatory sex offenders."
In 1993 the Oregon Legislature enacted …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- The Mental Torture of American Prisoners: Cheaper Than Lab Rats, Part 2, by Hans Sherrer
- Medical Care Unconstitutional in Puerto Rico Prisons
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- PLN Sues Michigan DOC over Censorship of The Celling of America
- Michigan Department of Corrections Fined $300,000 in Contempt Case
- Former Jail Prisoner Awarded $8,000 for Abuse; PLRA Attorney Fee Limit Inapplicable to Juveniles
- Jailhouse Journalism: The Fourth Estate Behind Bars by James McGrath (Book Review), by Paul Wright
- Losing the Vote: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States (Book Review), by Alex Friedmann
- PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Not Retroactive
- PLRA Fee Provisions Apply to All Pending Cases in the Fifth Circuit
- Eighth Circuit Upholds, Defines IFP Provisions
- IFP Application Not Required When Suit Filed
- Physical Injury Requirement Not Retroactive
- No Leave to Amend Complaint for IFP Litigants
- PLRA Doesn't Ban Class Actions
- Trouble in Mind: ADX – The Fourth Year, by Ray Luc Levasseur
- Daring Death Row Escape Shakes up Texas
- Oregon "Predatory Sex Offender" Label Requires Notice and Hearing
- De Facto Ban on Live Testimony Unconstitutional
- South Carolina Parole Elimination Violates Ex Post Facto
- Illegal Detention Violates Substantive Due Process
- Jury Awards $8,000 in California Prison Assault
- New York Prisoners Have Right to Staff Assistance and Witness Testimony
- Seventh Circuit Defines Court Access Claims Involving Property
- Failure to Give Summary Judgement Notice is Reversible Error
- Indiana May Not Deny Pay and Educational Programs to Protective Custody Prisoners
- No Appeal Allowed in Louisiana Consent Decree Dissolution
- U.S. District Courts Have No Authority To Grant Or Deny Credit Toward Sentence
- Denial of Good Time Because of Jury Sentencing Choice Violates Equal Protection
- $45,000 Award in BOP Tort Claim Medical Neglect Suit
- Released Sex Offender Not "In Custody" for Habeas
- New York Jail Brutality Suit Settled for $3,500
- Timothy "Little Rock" Reed Released on Parole
- $1,500 in Disabled Prisoner Work Suit
- $355,000 Verdict in New York Asthma Death
- Mauro Vacated for Rehearing
- Parole Change May Violate Ex Post Facto; Change Can Be Challenged Via § 1983
- BOP Violent Offender Notification Policy Overinclusive
- Twenty-Four Hour Notice of Disciplinary Charges Required
- Seizure of Trust Account Interest Violates Takings Clause
- Denial of Handicapped Jail Facilities Set for Trial
- News in Brief
- Cane Seizure Can Violate Eighth Amendment
- $250,000 FTCA Beating Judgment Reversed
More from these topics:
- New Mexico Supreme Court Holds Corrections Department Regulations Do Not Exempt Use-Of-Force Documents from Public Records Disclosure, Aug. 1, 2026. Disclosure of Records, Public Records, Public Records Act, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- Virtual Reality Intervention Improves Police-Interaction Skills for Autistic Individuals, Aug. 1, 2026. Discrimination, Americans with Disabilities Act, Staff Training.
- Louisiana’s Atavistic Approach to Criminal Sentencing and Parole Demonstrates Politicians’ Failure to Learn from Past Mistakes, July 1, 2026. Medical, Conditions of Confinement, Sentencing, Parole, Prisoners' Rights.
- California Appeals Court Sustains Amendments to CDCR that Narrow Youth Parole Eligibility Rules, July 1, 2026. Parole, Equal Protection Clause/Claims, Juvenile Offenses/Offenders, Credits, Prison Regulations.
- Louisiana Republicans Eliminate Elected Office Won by Exonerated Ex-Prisoner, July 1, 2026. Discrimination, Constitutional Challenges/Law, Public Trial, Civil Rights Actions or Offenses/Bivens Actions, Fair Trial.
- Ohio Jail Leaders Knew Cameras Were Broken for Four Years Before Fixing Them, July 1, 2026. Jail Misconduct, Security Systems, Disclosure of Records, Wrongful Death, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of.
- Florida Supreme Court Announces “Results” of Postconviction DNA Testing Under § 925.11 Include Underlying Testing Data Necessary for Expert Analysis, Holding That No Additional Burden Applies Once a Motion for Testing Has Been Granted, June 1, 2026. DNA Testing/Samples, Disclosure of Records, Public Records, Forensic Sciences, Scientific Testimony or Evidence.
- Ohio Supreme Court Rules that Sheriff Did Not Violate Open Records Act and Declines to Award Damages to Prisoner, June 1, 2026. GEO Group/Wackenhut, Contempt (Civil Procedure), Disclosure of Records, Public Records, Public Records Act.
- Sixth Circuit Rules Prisoner Held After Parole Board Ordered Release on Parole Could Not State a Rights Violation Claim, June 1, 2026. Parole, Overdetention, Qualified Immunity, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, 42 U.S. Code § 1983, civil action for deprivation of rights.
- Oklahoma Supreme Court: Jail Trust Cannot Withhold Requested Records under Law Enforcement Exemption of ORA, May 1, 2026. Summary Judgment, Disclosure of Records, Public Records, Public Records Act, Statutory Construction/Interpretation.