Skip navigation
× You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.

Mauro Vacated for Rehearing

In the February, 1999, issue of PLN we reported Mauro v. Arpaio, 147 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 1998) which struck down as unconstitutional an Arizona jail's ban on sexually explicit material. The Ninth circuit has ordered that opinion withdrawn because a panel of 11 judges will rehear the case en banc. PLN will report the outcome when a final ruling is issued. See: Mauro v. Arpaio, 162 F.3d 547 (9th Cir. 1998).

As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

Related legal case

Mauro v. Arpaio

Mauro v. Arpaio, 162 F.3d 547 (9th Cir. 12/02/1998)

[1] U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit


[2] No. 97-16021


[4] December 02, 1998


[5] JONATHAN D. MAURO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, SHERIFF; MARICOPA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. ARIZONA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, INTERVENOR.


[6] D.C. No. CV-95-02729-RCB


[7] FOR PUBLICATION


[8] ORDER


[9] Before: HUG, Chief Judge.


[10] Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active Judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-Judge panel opinion, Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021, slip op. at 10013 (9th Cir. Sept. 1, 1998), is withdrawn.