×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Filing Fee Refunded in Habeas Case
Loaded on Feb. 15, 2000
published in Prison Legal News
February, 2000, page 10
A federal district court in Massachusetts held that a habeas petitioner had incorrectly been required to pay the appellate filing fee. Because the Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) filing fee requirements do not apply to habeas petitions the court ordered the filing fee refunded to the prisoner. See: Austin v. ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- California Guards Abuse Young Prisoners, by Willie Wisely
- Georgia Prisoner Wins $60,000 Retaliation Verdict
- From the Editor, by Paul Wright
- Reviews: Legal Research: How to Find & Understand the Law, 7th ed., by Allan Parmelee
- Reviews: Finding the Right Lawyer, by Allan Parmelee
- Prisoners' Guerrilla Handbook to Correspondence Programs in the U.S. and Canada: High School, Vocational, Paralegal and College Courses, by Paul Wright
- Reviews: Voices From Within the Prison Walls, by Rick Card
- Federal Criminal Defendant's Handbook: Negotiating the Long, Lonely Road from Arrest, to Prison, to Freedom, by Paul Wright
- Enemies of the State: A Frank Discussion of Past Political Movements, Victories and Errors and the Current Political Climate for Revolutionary Struggle Within the USA, by Paul Wright
- A Matter of Law, by Mumia Abu-Jamal
- Amended Arizona Statute of Limitations Not Retroactive
- Habeas Challenging Transfer to Private Prison Dismissed
- Abuse of Force at Virginia's Supermax, by Dan Pens
- Tenth Circuit Clarifies Three Strikes
- Wisconsin Release Account Used to Pay Filing Fees
- Warden Purged of Contempt
- Litigation Costs Not Dischargeable in Bankruptcy
- PLRA Doesn't Apply to Civil Commitments
- 28 U.S.C. § 1915A Applies to All Prisoner Suits
- Filing Fee Refunded in Habeas Case
- No Filing Fee Required if IFP Denied in DC Circuit
- Prison Guard Golf Tourney Tees off Town
- Washington Prison Slavery Runs Competitors Out of Business, by Paul Wright
- Water Jet Companies Challenge Washington Slave Labor Laws
- Sylvia Baraldini Goes Home After Sixteen Years, by Julia Lutsky
- Torture "Aberrational" in U.S.
- Israeli Supreme Court Limits Torture
- Michigan DOC Settles DOJ Sexual Abuse Lawsuit, by Maia Justine Storm
- Prison Health Services Refuses to Pay
- Judicial Screening Applies Only to IFP Suits
- Lack of Evidence Bars Disciplinary Finding of Guilt
- Delay in Treating Injured Shoulder States Claim
- America's Toughest Sheriff Settles for $8.25 Million in Wrongful Death Suit
- Prison Realty Hires PR Firm
- "Three Strikes" Provision of PLRA Unconstitutional
- Florida State Prison Halloween Melee
- Constitutionality of ADA Upheld by Fourth Circuit
- Cell Feed Status May Give Jailer Actual Notice of Need to Protect Prisoner
- New Jersey Sex Offender Porn Ban Upheld
- PLRA Administrative Remedy Exhaustion Requirement Not Retroactive
- New York Parole Board Commissioner Convicted, by Julia Lutsky
- Nine Florida Guards Injured in Scuffle
- Whitestone Foundation
- Oregon DOC Liable for Attacks by Parolees
- Miscarriage is Serious Medical Condition
- Indigence is Cause to Retax Costs
- Notice of Summary Judgment Requirements Mandatory
- News in Brief
More from these topics:
- On Remand, Eleventh Circuit Clarifies, Affirms Grant of Habeas Relief to Death Row Prisoner, Aug. 1, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Death Penalty, Death Row.
- Fifth Circuit Announces When Initial § 2255 Petition Not Decided on Merits and Appeals Court Later Recalls Mandate Dismissing Direct Appeal and Affirms Conviction, Subsequent § 2255 Petition Not ‘Second or Successive’ Under AEDPA, Aug. 1, 2025. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA.
- Fourth Circuit Announces Counterman v. Colorado Is New Rule of Constitutional Law That Applies Retroactively to Cases on Collateral Review and Grants Authorization to File Successive § 2255 Motion, July 1, 2025. Rehabilitation/Recidivism, Habeas Corpus, Threats.
- Arguing Successful Federal Habeas Corpus Claims, June 1, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Sixth Amendment, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel.
- Ninth Circuit Grants Stay and Abeyance of Federal Habeas Petition to Allow Petitioner to Exhaust State Remedies, April 15, 2025. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Amendments to Petition.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, Feb. 1, 2025. junk science, Habeas Corpus, Forensic Sciences, Child Abuse/Abusers, Evidence - Admissibility.
- California Prisoner Awarded Over $1.26 Million in Suit Challenging Withheld Legal Mail Which Resulted in Habeas Loss, Jan. 15, 2025. Settlements, Habeas Corpus, Mail Regulations, Legal Mail.
- Georgia Supreme Court Grants Habeas Relief Where Both Trial and Appellate Counsel Provided Ineffective Assistance by Failing to Challenge Indictment for Residential Burglary That Failed to Allege Defendant Illegally Entered a ‘Dwelling’, Jan. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Constitutional Challenges/Law.
- Ninth Circuit Holds District Courts Have No Authority Under Rule 4 of Rules Governing § 2254 Cases to Dismiss Habeas Petition on the Merits, Dec. 15, 2024. Habeas Corpus, Dismissal, Authority and Jurisdiction.